How can my business sue someone to recover money?

Feb 28, 2024 | Publication

Lawyers are often asked about the process of recovering money owed as a result of, for instance, a failure to pay for goods or services or a breach of contract.

Normally a business (or an individual) will issue a letter of demand as a precursor to suing someone to recovery money.

It is not strictly necessary to issue a letter of demand normally, however it is generally good practice to do so.

The letter of demand will normally give a deadline for payment.  If payment is not received, legal proceedings may be commenced.  A well written letter of demand can recover money quickly.

In New South Wales, the Supreme Court of NSW, the District Court of NSW and Local Court of NSW deal with most claims to recover money depending upon the precise amount of money that is owed.

If no satisfactory response is received to the letter of demand, a Statement of Claim can be filed in the Court.

The Statement of Claim sets out in detail the parties to the claim, the basis for the claim, how the claim arises and the relief sought.

The Statement of Claim is filed with the Court and then served on the defendant (the party that owes the money).

If the defendant takes no action within 28 days of service, an application for default judgment can be made to the Court.

Once default judgment is obtained, the judgment of the Court can be enforced.

Various options exist for enforcing a judgment including issuing a statutory demand, commencing winding up proceedings and the appointment of a liquidator, issuing a bankruptcy notice, applying for a garnishee order against wages or accounts, applying for a writ, issuing an examination notice and applying for an examination order.

For an obligation free discussion please contact us on 1800 180 500 or email reception@mcauleylawyers.com.au

The information in this publication is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavour to provide accurate and timely information, we do not guarantee that the information in this publication is accurate at the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. We are not responsible for the information of any source to which a link is provided or reference is made and exclude all liability in connection with use of these sources. If you do not wish to receive newsletters from us, please let us know.

Latest Insights

How does the court assess pain and suffering?

In New South Wales (NSW), the assessment of pain and suffering—referred to legally as non-economic loss—is governed by the Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) ("CLA"). This is compensation for the intangible effects of the injury, such as pain and suffering, loss of...

Property Disputes – How Can They Arise?

Property disputes arise in many different ways – not only in commercial contexts but also in residential settings.  Some of the types of property disputes include:...

Can a Child under 14 years commit a Crime?

In New South Wales, the age of criminal responsibility is 10 years old.  A child under 10 cannot be charged with a criminal offence. For children aged 10 to under 14, there is a legal presumption known as doli incapax, which assumes the child is incapable of...

Why is it important to know who your client is?

In a range of contexts, it is important to know who your client is. In most professional service contexts, the identity of the client is the starting point to providing advice.  If it is not clear who the professional advisor is advising, this can cause issues as...

Mental Harm Damages Following Birth Trauma: Lessons from Sorbello

In South Western Sydney Local Health District v Sorbello [2024] NSWCA 14, the New South Wales Court of Appeal has provided timely guidance on two important issues in personal injury litigation: how courts choose between competing expert opinions on mental harm, and...

Damages for Defamation – Newman v Whittington [2025] NSWSC 275

A family dispute resolution practitioner was awarded $150,000 in aggravated damages, $10,000 in interest, and an injunction in a recent Supreme Court of New South Wales case. The defendant posted defamatory statements about the plaintiff on WordPress, Facebook, and...

Review Panel Determines Right Hand Injury as Non-Threshold Injury

The Personal Injury Commission (PIC) has ruled in Tasseli v Insurance Australia Limited t/as NRMA Insurance [2025] NSWPICMP 49 that damage to pre-existing surgical hardware constitutes a non-threshold injury, entitling the Claimant to ongoing statutory benefits and...

What are 5 legal requirements for a business?

When a new business is set up, there are various legal aspects which should be considered.  Some are more important than others in the early stages.  Obviously the nature of the business will dictate more specific legal requirements. We set out below some...

Court Dismisses Group Proceeding

A significant class action against Waller Legal Pty Ltd has been halted after the Supreme Court of Victoria ruled that the proceeding should no longer continue as a group proceeding. The case, Jane Jones (a pseudonym) v Waller Legal Pty Ltd [2025] VSC 42, involved...