Teacher convicted for failing to report sexual abuse of a child

Nov 6, 2023 | Publication

Teacher, Mr Webb of Trinity College Perth, was unsuccessful in his appeal against his conviction of failing to report sexual abuse of a child in a decision delivered on 13 October 2021.

In April 2017, a group of boys from the school went on a school rugby trip to Japan. Mr Webb was one of three teachers who accompanied the boys on the rugby trip.

On 11 April 2017, one of the boys, AB, was assaulted by a group of boys. In the course of the assault, the boys held AB down, removed his underwear and penetrated his anus with an object. AB later discovered that the object was a carrot. There was no contest at trial that AB was assaulted in the manner that he described.

Mr Webb did not report the incident in the form required by the Children and Community Services Act 2004 (WA). The incident was ultimately reported by the Acting Headmaster of the school.

The issue at trial was whether the appellant ‘believe on reasonable grounds’ that AB had been the subject of sexual abuse. That is, whether Mr Webb had a subjective state of mind inclining towards assent to, rather than rejecting, the proposition that AB had been the subject of sexual abuse.

The Court found Mr Webb guilty of being a teacher who in the course of his work as a teacher formed the belief on reasonable grounds that a child had been the subject of sexual abuse, he failed to report that belief as soon as practicable after forming the belief, contrary to s 124B of the Children and Community Services Act 2004 (WA).

His Honour entered a judgment of conviction, imposed a fine of $1,200 and made a spent conviction order.

On appeal the Court held that to the extent that Mr Webb teacher’s interview contained denials of the Mr Webb’s positive belief, those denials must be rejected in light of all of the circumstances. Those denials could not, when considered in light of all of the circumstances, give rise to a reasonable inference consistent with innocence. The learned magistrate was therefore correct to conclude that the only reasonable inference was that Mr Webb formed the requisite belief and that it was on reasonable grounds.

The case of Webb v Tang WASC 344 can be read in full here <https://jade.io/article/841410.

The information in this publication is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavour to provide accurate and timely information, we do not guarantee that the information in this publication is accurate at the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. We are not responsible for the information of any source to which a link is provided or reference is made and exclude all liability in connection with use of these sources. If you do not wish to receive newsletters from us, please let us know.

Latest Insights

If I die without a Will what can happen?

If you die without a Will there can be many unintended consequences. Some of these consequences may be: A person who you do not intend could control your estate.  This could even be someone you do not know.  An executor is a person who controls an estate...

10 Myths of Deceased Estates

Myth #1 – If I die without a Will it is no big deal. Truth:  It can be a very big deal.  There are lots of reasons for having a Will including controlling who is appointed as Executor, controlling who your Estate is paid to, appointing a Guardian for...

Unfair Contract Terms

Changes to the law relating to unfair contract terms come into effect on 9 November 2023. From this date, proposing, using or relying on unfair contract terms in standard form contracts will be banned. Penalties for breaches of the law will apply. The law has also...

What property can be used for a family provision order?

If certain categories of persons are left out of a Will or inadequate provision is made for them in a Will or by way of intestacy, such person may be entitled to bring a claim on the estate. This begs the question what property can be used to satisfy such a claim by...