Brick cleaner falls 4.5m from scaffolding, awarded $1,043,000 in damages

Jul 12, 2023 | Publication

In 2007, the plaintiff was working as a self-employed brick cleaner on a building site, occupied by the defendant, a building company, at the time of the incident. The plaintiff fell approximately 4.5 metres, from scaffolding onto a pile of bricks. The scaffolding was allegedly erected incorrectly, and the plaintiff suffered serious injury, which exacerbated pre-existing injuries. As a result, the plaintiff brought claims against the occupier of the premises, the defendant, for negligence and claimed damages.

As per Zammit J at 350: “The critical issue in this case was to what extent the plaintiff’s fall caused or materially contributed to his back and neck conditions. Liability was also hotly contested but it was not as complex as causation.”

The defendant accepted that it owed a duty of care to the plaintiff, as occupier of the building site, however, denied that there was a breach of that duty. If a breach was to be found, that the plaintiff contributed to the negligence as there was an obvious risk being on the scaffolding bay. Additionally, the defendant argued that the cause of the injury was not material because the plaintiff’s injuries were wholly pre-existing.

The Court found in favour of the plaintiff, rejecting the argument of contributory negligence, and awarded the plaintiff damages of $1,043,000, for general damages, economic loss, attendant care and medical expenses. It was found that the breach was due to deficient scaffolding, which did not have fall protection and was inadequately assembled.

The decision of Bucic v Arnej Pty Ltd  VSC 330 can be read in full here.

The information in this publication is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavour to provide accurate and timely information, we do not guarantee that the information in this publication is accurate at the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. We are not responsible for the information of any source to which a link is provided or reference is made and exclude all liability in connection with use of these sources. If you do not wish to receive newsletters from us, please let us know.

Latest Insights

McAuley Lawyers Welcomes Roland Barros

McAuley Lawyers is pleased to announce that Roland Barros has joined the firm as a solicitor, bringing with him decades of legal experience and a strong reputation for providing practical and reliable legal advice. Admitted as a solicitor in 1978, Roland brings more...

Application for consent to vasectomy

A Western Australian Tribunal considered an application by the parents of a 23-year-old man, referred to as JC. They were seeking approval for a vasectomy under the Guardianship and Administration Act 1990 (WA). JC has a rare genetic condition that causes an...

NSW Government Strengthens Laws to Combat Crime and Corruption

The New South Wales Government has introduced a bill designed to strengthen the legal framework for investigating serious crime and corruption. The reforms aim to equip investigative agencies with more effective tools while carefully balancing privacy protections....