Court awards plaintiff $1,273,125 following two sexual assaults in 1983

Mar 20, 2023 | Publication

Mr Miles, the plaintiff, was successful in his claim against Mr Doyle and awarded substantial compensation following two historic sexual assaults which occurred on one night in 1983. The case is noteworthy in considering the Court’s assessment of damages for sexual abuse cases.

Mr Miles claimed that as a result of the sexual assaults by Mr Doyle (in respect of which there had been convictions) he developed a psychiatric injury and had suffered significant loss. Mr Miles said that his life would have taken a completely different turn if not for the conduct of the defendant.

The defendant had declared bankruptcy and was imprisoned having been convicted of a series of historical sexual assault charges including in respect of the plaintiff.

The court did not accept that the plaintiff has been suffering from a psychological condition in the nature of depression since immediately after the assaults took place. Rather, this is a case in which the development of a psychological condition occurred many years after the events at a time when the plaintiff was compelled to relive and confront the events and his abuser and engage in protracted and contested criminal and civil proceedings.

Mr Miles had not established that the effect of the sexual assaults was that he was unable to complete his course at Duntroon or stay in the military at all and was unable to become a commercial pilot. In reality, Mr Miles chose other options (immediately after leaving the military) and made other career choices. These conclusions rather rendered much of the Mr Miles’ expert accounting report irrelevant.

Damages were ultimately assessed as follows:

General damages $200,000

Interest on past general damages $71,500

Past economic loss $527,000

Interest on past economic loss $144,925

Future economic loss $200,000

Loss of superannuation (averaged at 10% for the past and then 11% for the future) $74,700

Future medical expenses $20,000

Aggravated damages $35,000

Total $1,273,125

The case of Miles v Doyle (No 2) NSWSC 1322 can be read in full
here <https://jade.io/article/841813>.

The information in this publication is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavour to provide accurate and timely information, we do not guarantee that the information in this publication is accurate at the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. We are not responsible for the information of any source to which a link is provided or reference is made and exclude all liability in connection with use of these sources. If you do not wish to receive newsletters from us, please let us know.

Latest Insights

The Rise of Generative AI in Law and the Need for Caution

Generative artificial intelligence (Gen AI), a subset of artificial intelligence focused on creating new content, has gained significant traction in various industries, including law. Capable of producing text, images, and audio, platforms like ChatGPT are among the...

Australia Introduces Statutory Tort for Serious Invasions of Privacy

The Australian legal landscape is about to undergo a significant transformation with the introduction of a statutory tort for serious invasions of privacy. This change comes with the passage of the Privacy and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2024 by the Commonwealth...

Building Disputes – Which Court or Tribunal Deals with Them?

In New South Wales, there are different forums to have building disputes and claims addressed. The NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal handles building disputes particularly residential building work claims.  There are numerous claims prosecuted and defended in...

When should a business take legal action on an overdue account?

Generally speaking, an overdue account should be acted on promptly.  The longer it is left, the greater the likelihood the account will need to be written off. Unless the debtor has a satisfactory reason for delaying payment, the account should be followed...

Court Rules Against Kmart in Personal Injury Appeal

In a recent case, Kmart has been held liable for injuries sustained by a customer in its Woy Woy store, after a mountain bike in a heavy, oversized box fell from another customer's shopping trolley, injuring Ms Rita Marmara. The New South Wales Court of Appeal upheld...

Can a Shareholder claim against a Company?

A shareholder can claim against a company under some circumstances. Shareholders have specific rights and interests in a company, and there are scenarios where they might have grounds to make a claim. Some common situations include: Breach of Shareholder Agreement: If...

Court of Appeal Clarifies GP’s Duty of Care in Varipatis v Almario

In a landmark decision, the New South Wales Court of Appeal upheld the appeal of a general practitioner (GP) who was previously found negligent for not referring a morbidly obese patient for bariatric surgery. The case, Varipatis v Almario [2013] NSWCA 76, provides...