Court awards plaintiff $1,273,125 following two sexual assaults in 1983

Mar 20, 2023 | Publication

Mr Miles, the plaintiff, was successful in his claim against Mr Doyle and awarded substantial compensation following two historic sexual assaults which occurred on one night in 1983. The case is noteworthy in considering the Court’s assessment of damages for sexual abuse cases.

Mr Miles claimed that as a result of the sexual assaults by Mr Doyle (in respect of which there had been convictions) he developed a psychiatric injury and had suffered significant loss. Mr Miles said that his life would have taken a completely different turn if not for the conduct of the defendant.

The defendant had declared bankruptcy and was imprisoned having been convicted of a series of historical sexual assault charges including in respect of the plaintiff.

The court did not accept that the plaintiff has been suffering from a psychological condition in the nature of depression since immediately after the assaults took place. Rather, this is a case in which the development of a psychological condition occurred many years after the events at a time when the plaintiff was compelled to relive and confront the events and his abuser and engage in protracted and contested criminal and civil proceedings.

Mr Miles had not established that the effect of the sexual assaults was that he was unable to complete his course at Duntroon or stay in the military at all and was unable to become a commercial pilot. In reality, Mr Miles chose other options (immediately after leaving the military) and made other career choices. These conclusions rather rendered much of the Mr Miles’ expert accounting report irrelevant.

Damages were ultimately assessed as follows:

General damages $200,000

Interest on past general damages $71,500

Past economic loss $527,000

Interest on past economic loss $144,925

Future economic loss $200,000

Loss of superannuation (averaged at 10% for the past and then 11% for the future) $74,700

Future medical expenses $20,000

Aggravated damages $35,000

Total $1,273,125

The case of Miles v Doyle (No 2) NSWSC 1322 can be read in full
here <https://jade.io/article/841813>.

The information in this publication is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavour to provide accurate and timely information, we do not guarantee that the information in this publication is accurate at the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. We are not responsible for the information of any source to which a link is provided or reference is made and exclude all liability in connection with use of these sources. If you do not wish to receive newsletters from us, please let us know.

Latest Insights

Partnership Disputes – Causes and Resolution

Partnerships are a common business structure.  Frequently we see disputes where one or more partners wishes to leave the partnership, and financial and other disputes relating to a partnership.  Understanding the causes of these disputes and how they can be...

What Types of Claims can be made on a Deceased Estate?

A deceased estate has a range of potential claims that can be made against it.  These arise not only from the actions of the deceased but also from legislation that deals with how deceased estates are administered and distributed. Some examples of potential...

Fundamentals of Companies – Getting the Basics Right

A company is a separate legal entity, being an artificial person that only ceases to exist via the hands of its members or via government intervention.  A company’s personality is expressed in its constitution and enables the members of the company to combine...

Loss of chance

In the landmark decision of Tabet v Gett [2010] 240 CLR 537, the High Court of Australia provided crucial insights into the principles of causation in negligence claims. This case is pivotal for understanding how courts assess the direct link between alleged...

Webinar – How to Reduce the Risk of a Claim on Your Estate

Join us for an informative seminar on "How to Reduce the Risk of a Claim on Your Estate" via Zoom on Thursday, 5 September at 8 pm. This one-hour complimentary session, including a Q&A segment, will provide valuable insights and practical strategies to safeguard...

New Industrial Manslaughter laws in NSW

The Industrial Manslaughter Bill has passed NSW Parliament and will make industrial manslaugther an offence. According to the NSW government, since 2019 more than 300 workers have been killed in NSW.  Under the new law, a business or individual can be held...

8 Types of People that can Claim on a Deceased Estate

In New South Wales, there are many different types of people that can potentially claim on a deceased estate if, for instance, inadequate or no provision has been made for them or they are owed money by the estate (or they were owed money by the deceased).  ...

What is the difference between Joint Tenancy and Tenants in Common?

A very important difference in ownership of property where there are two or more owners is Joint Tenancy v Tenants in Common. It is essential to understand the difference when and if you buy property with another person. If you own a property as Joint Tenants and one...