Court disallows expert reports not included in Pre-Filing Statement

Jun 21, 2023 | Publication

The decision of Skinner v The State of New South Wales  NSWDC 36 is significant in that it provides guidance on section 318 of the Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act 1998 (NSW) and the onerous requirements for claimants to ensure full disclosure when serving its Pre-Filing Statement.

In this decision, a former officer of the New South Wales Police Force commenced a claim for ‘work injury damages’. The plaintiff suffered psychiatric illness following a nearly 20 year career in the service. Throughout that career, in the performance of her general duties, she was exposed to many traumatic incidents. But the plaintiff also asserted that she had difficulties in the workplace itself, with colleagues and supervisors, and she complained of bullying and harassment. She alleged that the Police Force negligently failed to take steps to protect her from developing her psychiatric illness.

The court ruled that one of the plaintiff’s experts report to be inadmissible due to the requirement of section 318(2) and all but two pages of a further report inadmissible. The court determined that the plaintiff would not be substantially prejudiced by the rejection of the evidence.

The decision confirms the importance of claimants ‘front-end loading’ their claims at the filing of the Pre-Filing Statement. The policy consideration behind section 318 is to encourage settlement at mediation.

The information in this publication is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavour to provide accurate and timely information, we do not guarantee that the information in this publication is accurate at the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. We are not responsible for the information of any source to which a link is provided or reference is made and exclude all liability in connection with use of these sources. If you do not wish to receive newsletters from us, please let us know.

Latest Insights

New Coercive Control Laws in NSW as of 1 July 2024

From 1 July 2024, coercive control will be a crime in NSW when a person uses abusive behaviours towards a current or former intimate partner with the intention to coerce or control them. The Crimes Legislation Amendment (Coercive Control) Act 2022makes it an...

Key Rules on Discovery Procedures for Prospective Defendants

Rules 5.2 and 5.3 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (UCPR) provide essential guidelines on discovery aimed at identifying or locating prospective defendants. These rules are instrumental in the pre-litigation process, ensuring that applicants can gather...

5 Ways A Director Can Be Sued

Directors can be sued for all sorts of reasons.  Here are 5 of them. Reason #1: Insolvent Trading A director can be sued if the company he or she is a director of trades whilst insolvent.  A director has a duty to prevent the company trading and incurring...

7 Ways to Enforce a Judgment

After a judgment is obtained for an amount of money, there are numerous options open to a judgment creditor in relation to how to enforce the judgment (i.e. how to obtain the money which is owed pursuant to the judgment). Option #1: Issue a Bankruptcy Notice If the...

Who Can Bring a Compensation to Relatives Claim?

In the unfortunate event of a loved one's passing due to negligence or wrongful act, the Compensation to Relatives Act 1897 in New South Wales outlines the parameters for pursuing compensation on behalf of the deceased. Understanding who has the legal standing to...

10 Myths of Being Sued

If you or your business are sued, there are many myths about how the legal process will pan out.  Here are 10 myths about the legal process – all are incorrect. Myth #1: The matter will definitely go to a hearing Most matters settle before a Judge decides...