Court Finds Mt Owen Pty Ltd Liable for Employee’s Negligence in Glendell Coal Mine Accident

Apr 28, 2023 | Publication

The New South Wales Court of Appeal has ruled that a host employer, in this case Mt Owen Pty Ltd, is vicariously liable for the negligence of a worker, Mitchell Kemp, who injured a colleague during maintenance of a bulldozer at Glendell coal mine in July 2017. Mr Kemp was employed by Titan Technicians Enterprise Pty Ltd, which contracted with Mt Owen for labour hire.

A third worker was also involved in the maintenance work. During the work, Mr Kemp dropped the bulldozer’s blade suddenly, causing the track on which Glen Parkes was standing to flick up and crush his right leg between the track and the edge of the access platform beside the cabin of the bulldozer.

Mr Parkes claimed damages against both Mt Owen and Titan. The primary issues on appeal were whether Mt Owen was vicariously liable for Mr Kemp’s negligence and whether Titan, as Mr Parkes’ legal employer, breached its duty of care to him.

The trial judge found both Mt Owen and Titan breached their duty of care to Mr Parkes and apportioned liability 60% for Mr Kemp’s negligence, for which Mt Owen was responsible, and 40% to be shared equally by Mt Owen and Titan. The trial judge awarded $2,050,953 in damages.

Mt Owen appealed the findings that it was liable, while Titan cross-appealed the attribution of liability ascribed to it.

The Court held that Mt Owen was vicariously liable for Mr Kemp’s negligence, while Titan, as Mr Parkes’ legal employer, did not breach its duty of care to him.

The case highlights the complexities of the modern labour hire environment and the potential for a shift of liability from the legal employer to the host employer, depending on the nature and extent of control over a worker.

The information in this publication is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavour to provide accurate and timely information, we do not guarantee that the information in this publication is accurate at the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. We are not responsible for the information of any source to which a link is provided or reference is made and exclude all liability in connection with use of these sources. If you do not wish to receive newsletters from us, please let us know.

Latest Insights

The Rise of Generative AI in Law and the Need for Caution

Generative artificial intelligence (Gen AI), a subset of artificial intelligence focused on creating new content, has gained significant traction in various industries, including law. Capable of producing text, images, and audio, platforms like ChatGPT are among the...

Australia Introduces Statutory Tort for Serious Invasions of Privacy

The Australian legal landscape is about to undergo a significant transformation with the introduction of a statutory tort for serious invasions of privacy. This change comes with the passage of the Privacy and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2024 by the Commonwealth...

Building Disputes – Which Court or Tribunal Deals with Them?

In New South Wales, there are different forums to have building disputes and claims addressed. The NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal handles building disputes particularly residential building work claims.  There are numerous claims prosecuted and defended in...

When should a business take legal action on an overdue account?

Generally speaking, an overdue account should be acted on promptly.  The longer it is left, the greater the likelihood the account will need to be written off. Unless the debtor has a satisfactory reason for delaying payment, the account should be followed...

Court Rules Against Kmart in Personal Injury Appeal

In a recent case, Kmart has been held liable for injuries sustained by a customer in its Woy Woy store, after a mountain bike in a heavy, oversized box fell from another customer's shopping trolley, injuring Ms Rita Marmara. The New South Wales Court of Appeal upheld...

Can a Shareholder claim against a Company?

A shareholder can claim against a company under some circumstances. Shareholders have specific rights and interests in a company, and there are scenarios where they might have grounds to make a claim. Some common situations include: Breach of Shareholder Agreement: If...

Court of Appeal Clarifies GP’s Duty of Care in Varipatis v Almario

In a landmark decision, the New South Wales Court of Appeal upheld the appeal of a general practitioner (GP) who was previously found negligent for not referring a morbidly obese patient for bariatric surgery. The case, Varipatis v Almario [2013] NSWCA 76, provides...