Court Finds Mt Owen Pty Ltd Liable for Employee’s Negligence in Glendell Coal Mine Accident

Apr 28, 2023 | Publication

The New South Wales Court of Appeal has ruled that a host employer, in this case Mt Owen Pty Ltd, is vicariously liable for the negligence of a worker, Mitchell Kemp, who injured a colleague during maintenance of a bulldozer at Glendell coal mine in July 2017. Mr Kemp was employed by Titan Technicians Enterprise Pty Ltd, which contracted with Mt Owen for labour hire.

A third worker was also involved in the maintenance work. During the work, Mr Kemp dropped the bulldozer’s blade suddenly, causing the track on which Glen Parkes was standing to flick up and crush his right leg between the track and the edge of the access platform beside the cabin of the bulldozer.

Mr Parkes claimed damages against both Mt Owen and Titan. The primary issues on appeal were whether Mt Owen was vicariously liable for Mr Kemp’s negligence and whether Titan, as Mr Parkes’ legal employer, breached its duty of care to him.

The trial judge found both Mt Owen and Titan breached their duty of care to Mr Parkes and apportioned liability 60% for Mr Kemp’s negligence, for which Mt Owen was responsible, and 40% to be shared equally by Mt Owen and Titan. The trial judge awarded $2,050,953 in damages.

Mt Owen appealed the findings that it was liable, while Titan cross-appealed the attribution of liability ascribed to it.

The Court held that Mt Owen was vicariously liable for Mr Kemp’s negligence, while Titan, as Mr Parkes’ legal employer, did not breach its duty of care to him.

The case highlights the complexities of the modern labour hire environment and the potential for a shift of liability from the legal employer to the host employer, depending on the nature and extent of control over a worker.

The information in this publication is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavour to provide accurate and timely information, we do not guarantee that the information in this publication is accurate at the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. We are not responsible for the information of any source to which a link is provided or reference is made and exclude all liability in connection with use of these sources. If you do not wish to receive newsletters from us, please let us know.

Latest Insights

How does the court assess pain and suffering?

In New South Wales (NSW), the assessment of pain and suffering—referred to legally as non-economic loss—is governed by the Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) ("CLA"). This is compensation for the intangible effects of the injury, such as pain and suffering, loss of...

Property Disputes – How Can They Arise?

Property disputes arise in many different ways – not only in commercial contexts but also in residential settings.  Some of the types of property disputes include:...

Can a Child under 14 years commit a Crime?

In New South Wales, the age of criminal responsibility is 10 years old.  A child under 10 cannot be charged with a criminal offence. For children aged 10 to under 14, there is a legal presumption known as doli incapax, which assumes the child is incapable of...

Why is it important to know who your client is?

In a range of contexts, it is important to know who your client is. In most professional service contexts, the identity of the client is the starting point to providing advice.  If it is not clear who the professional advisor is advising, this can cause issues as...

Mental Harm Damages Following Birth Trauma: Lessons from Sorbello

In South Western Sydney Local Health District v Sorbello [2024] NSWCA 14, the New South Wales Court of Appeal has provided timely guidance on two important issues in personal injury litigation: how courts choose between competing expert opinions on mental harm, and...

Damages for Defamation – Newman v Whittington [2025] NSWSC 275

A family dispute resolution practitioner was awarded $150,000 in aggravated damages, $10,000 in interest, and an injunction in a recent Supreme Court of New South Wales case. The defendant posted defamatory statements about the plaintiff on WordPress, Facebook, and...

Review Panel Determines Right Hand Injury as Non-Threshold Injury

The Personal Injury Commission (PIC) has ruled in Tasseli v Insurance Australia Limited t/as NRMA Insurance [2025] NSWPICMP 49 that damage to pre-existing surgical hardware constitutes a non-threshold injury, entitling the Claimant to ongoing statutory benefits and...

What are 5 legal requirements for a business?

When a new business is set up, there are various legal aspects which should be considered.  Some are more important than others in the early stages.  Obviously the nature of the business will dictate more specific legal requirements. We set out below some...

Court Dismisses Group Proceeding

A significant class action against Waller Legal Pty Ltd has been halted after the Supreme Court of Victoria ruled that the proceeding should no longer continue as a group proceeding. The case, Jane Jones (a pseudonym) v Waller Legal Pty Ltd [2025] VSC 42, involved...