Daughter successfully sues father for sexual abuse

Jul 17, 2023 | Publication

The case of BDT v BDG  QDC 74 involved a daughter successfully suing her father for abuse between 15 August 1973 and 20 September 1983. While the plaintiff was aged between five and 15 years old, on 11 occasions, the plaintiff was sexually and physically abused.

This abuse consisted of six instances of vaginal rape, one instance of simulated intercourse, one instance of attempted rape, and instances of the defendant licking the plaintiff’s genitalia amongst other instances of physical and sexual abuse. The plaintiff claimed the physical pain associated with the infliction of the injuries, and psychiatric injury in the form of post-traumatic stress disorder and chronic depressive symptoms.

Damages were assessed under a default judgment and the plaintiff was left with persisting depression, anxiety, flashbacks, sleeplessness, nightmares, a constant sense of fear of the defendant, memory problems and a lack of confidence and self-esteems. She has contemplated suicide and has been unable to engage in normal relationships and does not enjoy sexual intercourse.

The plaintiff was awarded general damages of $130,000 plus interest of $137,600. Past economic loss was $259,000 with interest of $212,040. In addition, there was past loss of superannuation of $20,720. Future economic loss was assessed at $170,000 and future loss of superannuation at $19,261. Aggravated and exemplary damages were not awarded for reasons which are unclear.

The decision of BDT v BDG  QDC 74 (McGill SC DCJ) can be read in full here: https://www.queenslandjudgments.com.au/caselaw/qdc/2019/74

The information in this publication is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavour to provide accurate and timely information, we do not guarantee that the information in this publication is accurate at the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. We are not responsible for the information of any source to which a link is provided or reference is made and exclude all liability in connection with use of these sources. If you do not wish to receive newsletters from us, please let us know.

Latest Insights

The Rise of Generative AI in Law and the Need for Caution

Generative artificial intelligence (Gen AI), a subset of artificial intelligence focused on creating new content, has gained significant traction in various industries, including law. Capable of producing text, images, and audio, platforms like ChatGPT are among the...

Australia Introduces Statutory Tort for Serious Invasions of Privacy

The Australian legal landscape is about to undergo a significant transformation with the introduction of a statutory tort for serious invasions of privacy. This change comes with the passage of the Privacy and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2024 by the Commonwealth...

Building Disputes – Which Court or Tribunal Deals with Them?

In New South Wales, there are different forums to have building disputes and claims addressed. The NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal handles building disputes particularly residential building work claims.  There are numerous claims prosecuted and defended in...

When should a business take legal action on an overdue account?

Generally speaking, an overdue account should be acted on promptly.  The longer it is left, the greater the likelihood the account will need to be written off. Unless the debtor has a satisfactory reason for delaying payment, the account should be followed...

Court Rules Against Kmart in Personal Injury Appeal

In a recent case, Kmart has been held liable for injuries sustained by a customer in its Woy Woy store, after a mountain bike in a heavy, oversized box fell from another customer's shopping trolley, injuring Ms Rita Marmara. The New South Wales Court of Appeal upheld...

Can a Shareholder claim against a Company?

A shareholder can claim against a company under some circumstances. Shareholders have specific rights and interests in a company, and there are scenarios where they might have grounds to make a claim. Some common situations include: Breach of Shareholder Agreement: If...

Court of Appeal Clarifies GP’s Duty of Care in Varipatis v Almario

In a landmark decision, the New South Wales Court of Appeal upheld the appeal of a general practitioner (GP) who was previously found negligent for not referring a morbidly obese patient for bariatric surgery. The case, Varipatis v Almario [2013] NSWCA 76, provides...