Exemplary Damages and Trespass to the Person: Navigating the Legal Landscape

Jan 23, 2024 | Publication

In the realm of personal injury law, a frequently asked question revolves around the availability of exemplary damages for trespass to the person. This query delves into the nuances of Section 21 of the Civil Liability Act (CLA) and its implications for individuals seeking compensation for intentional torts.

Trespass to the person is a legal term that encompasses a range of intentional torts (civil wrongs) involving interference with an individual’s bodily integrity or personal autonomy. Trespass to the person includes assault, battery and false imprisonment.

Section 21 of the CLA has long been a point of reference in personal injury cases arising from negligence, explicitly precluding the possibility of an award for exemplary damages. However, a crucial exception comes to light in the case of intentional torts, as highlighted by Section 3B(1)(a) of the CLA.

This specific provision clarifies that the constraints imposed by Section 21 do not extend to intentional torts, opening the door for claimants to pursue exemplary damages. The distinction between negligence and intentional torts is pivotal, as it influences the legal recourse available to those who have suffered personal injury due to intentional wrongdoing.

Exemplary damages, also known as punitive or punitive exemplary damages, are a unique form of compensation awarded with the primary purpose of punishing the wrongdoer. Unlike compensatory damages that aim to reimburse the victim for their losses, exemplary damages serve as a deterrent by punishing conduct that exhibits conscious wrongdoing in contumelious disregard of another’s rights.

Crucially, Section 3B(1)(a) of the CLA allows claimants in cases of intentional torts to seek exemplary damages, provided that the wrongful conduct meets specific criteria. The conduct in question must be deemed “reprehensible, highhanded, outrageous, or insulting” to warrant an award of exemplary damages.

This legal framework recognizes the need to address cases where the defendant’s actions go beyond mere negligence, involving a deliberate and intentional violation of the plaintiff’s rights. The availability of exemplary damages in such instances serves as a powerful tool to discourage and penalise behaviour that is not only harmful but also morally reprehensible.

In conclusion, individuals navigating the complexities of personal injury law, particularly in cases involving intentional torts such as trespass to the person, should be aware of the nuanced interplay between Section 21 and Section 3B(1)(a) of the CLA. The availability of exemplary damages in these situations underscores the legal system’s commitment to holding wrongdoers accountable for conduct that goes beyond mere negligence, providing a means of redress for victims who have suffered intentional harm.

The information in this publication is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavour to provide accurate and timely information, we do not guarantee that the information in this publication is accurate at the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. We are not responsible for the information of any source to which a link is provided or reference is made and exclude all liability in connection with use of these sources. If you do not wish to receive newsletters from us, please let us know.

Latest Insights

New Coercive Control Laws in NSW as of 1 July 2024

From 1 July 2024, coercive control will be a crime in NSW when a person uses abusive behaviours towards a current or former intimate partner with the intention to coerce or control them. The Crimes Legislation Amendment (Coercive Control) Act 2022makes it an...

Key Rules on Discovery Procedures for Prospective Defendants

Rules 5.2 and 5.3 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (UCPR) provide essential guidelines on discovery aimed at identifying or locating prospective defendants. These rules are instrumental in the pre-litigation process, ensuring that applicants can gather...

5 Ways A Director Can Be Sued

Directors can be sued for all sorts of reasons.  Here are 5 of them. Reason #1: Insolvent Trading A director can be sued if the company he or she is a director of trades whilst insolvent.  A director has a duty to prevent the company trading and incurring...

7 Ways to Enforce a Judgment

After a judgment is obtained for an amount of money, there are numerous options open to a judgment creditor in relation to how to enforce the judgment (i.e. how to obtain the money which is owed pursuant to the judgment). Option #1: Issue a Bankruptcy Notice If the...

Who Can Bring a Compensation to Relatives Claim?

In the unfortunate event of a loved one's passing due to negligence or wrongful act, the Compensation to Relatives Act 1897 in New South Wales outlines the parameters for pursuing compensation on behalf of the deceased. Understanding who has the legal standing to...

10 Myths of Being Sued

If you or your business are sued, there are many myths about how the legal process will pan out.  Here are 10 myths about the legal process – all are incorrect. Myth #1: The matter will definitely go to a hearing Most matters settle before a Judge decides...