Foreman awarded $1.4 million after being buried chest high after excavation collapses

Mar 14, 2023 | Publication

Mr Cootes was employed as a foreman on a construction site, when he suffered serious injuries following an excavation collapsed on him. The collapsed excavation caused fractures to his lower back, and post-traumatic stress disorder.

The plaintiff brought claims for damages against his employer Concrete Panels, the principal contractor, and the site supervisor. 

The incident occurred when the plaintiff attempted to retrieve a drill he noticed laying at the bottom of the trench when the excavation suddenly collapsed. His rescuer found Mr Cootes buried to the top of his chest. The trench was 700mm deep, however, to one side sat a 2.6m high excavation ‘face’.

The plaintiff had previously complained about the safety of the trench, and raised concerns of it caving in. The first defendant argued for 50% contributory negligence, however, Crow J found that although it was a misjudgement, it should not be judged with the benefit of hindsight and did not accept the argument of contributory negligence.

The Court found in favour of the plaintiff and found a duty of care was owed to the plaintiff from all three defendants, and that duty was breached. The total assessment of damages was awarded at $548,612.95 for the first defendant, and $909,504 for the second and third defendant.

The decision of Cootes v Concrete Panels & Ors  QSC 146 (Crow J) can be read in full here: https://www.queenslandjudgments.com.au/caselaw/qsc/2019/146 

The information in this publication is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavour to provide accurate and timely information, we do not guarantee that the information in this publication is accurate at the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. We are not responsible for the information of any source to which a link is provided or reference is made and exclude all liability in connection with use of these sources. If you do not wish to receive newsletters from us, please let us know.

Latest Insights

Application for consent to vasectomy

A Western Australian Tribunal considered an application by the parents of a 23-year-old man, referred to as JC. They were seeking approval for a vasectomy under the Guardianship and Administration Act 1990 (WA). JC has a rare genetic condition that causes an...

NSW Government Strengthens Laws to Combat Crime and Corruption

The New South Wales Government has introduced a bill designed to strengthen the legal framework for investigating serious crime and corruption. The reforms aim to equip investigative agencies with more effective tools while carefully balancing privacy protections....

Failure to Warn: When Does It Become Medical Negligence?

Medical practitioners have a responsibility to exercise reasonable care and skill when providing professional advice and treatment. Central to this duty is the obligation to warn patients of any material risks associated with the proposed treatment. A material risk is...

What Happens After a Hit and Run Accident in NSW?

A hit and run accident can be traumatic and confusing, especially when the at-fault driver flees the scene and cannot be identified. Many victims assume they have no way to recover compensation. In New South Wales, that is not correct – the CTP scheme provides a clear...