Former NRL player successfully sues Surgeon after career ending ACL surgery goes wrong

Jun 5, 2023 | Publication

The New South Wales Supreme Court awarded damages to former NRL player, Lucas Miller, following his medical negligence claim against a French Orthopaedic Surgeon. The young and promising NRL player had stints with both the Newcastle Knights and Melbourne Storm. He later moved to France to further develop his career and played for St Gaudens. Whilst playing in France, he suffered a ruptured anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury during a match in December of 2010. He was admitted to Medipole Clinique Du Sort, where he underwent an ACL reconstruction by the defendant. Following his rehabilitation, he returned to Australia in the hopes of returning to the NRL. 

However, he continued to suffer from discomfort post-surgery, and whilst training with West Newcastle Club in September 2011, he collapsed from pain in his knee. This led to his referral to Orthopaedic Surgeon Dr Caldwell, who confirmed he had suffered a complex tear of the medial meniscus and showed problems with the ACL graft. He underwent surgery on another 3 occasions, but ultimately could not return to the fitness and strength required for first grade football. He brought claims against the French surgeon, seeking damages. 

As with many medical negligence cases, the findings turned on expert evidence. The Court was persuaded by the evidence of the plaintiff’s expert evidence of consultant orthopaedic surgeon Dr Journeaux. The Court found in favour of the plaintiff, finding that there the ACL reconstruction was performed in a poor manner. 

Damages were assessed with heads of damages such as loss of earning capacity, and future out-of-pocket expenses. The Court assessed these damages at a significant amount, concluding that the plaintiff had a budding career ahead of him in the NRL. 

The evidence established that as a teenager, the plaintiff was considered to be a rugby league footballer of some ability. Michael Hagan, the former Director of Football at the Knights and a man of great experience in rugby league, gave the following evidence which was not challenged:

“At the time Lucas was in the junior squads with the Knights he would train with the NRL team. This is when I got to look at his ability, skill-set and temperament. He had a good work ethic. He was dedicated, professional and very competent at rugby league. For his age he was meeting all key criteria and was a good team member.

Lucas Miller was coachable – which means he responded to feedback to improve his game.”

I’m aware that players who establish themselves in the French competition are sometimes picked up by the English Super League or other competitions which can lead to much higher salaries than the French competition Lucas Miller was playing in. Lucas Miller was probably a mid-range player and his salary would have reflected this.”

The decision is also novel in that the Court applied the law of France to both issues of breach of duty of care and assessment of damages.

The information in this publication is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavour to provide accurate and timely information, we do not guarantee that the information in this publication is accurate at the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. We are not responsible for the information of any source to which a link is provided or reference is made and exclude all liability in connection with use of these sources. If you do not wish to receive newsletters from us, please let us know.

Latest Insights

The Rise of Generative AI in Law and the Need for Caution

Generative artificial intelligence (Gen AI), a subset of artificial intelligence focused on creating new content, has gained significant traction in various industries, including law. Capable of producing text, images, and audio, platforms like ChatGPT are among the...

Australia Introduces Statutory Tort for Serious Invasions of Privacy

The Australian legal landscape is about to undergo a significant transformation with the introduction of a statutory tort for serious invasions of privacy. This change comes with the passage of the Privacy and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2024 by the Commonwealth...

Building Disputes – Which Court or Tribunal Deals with Them?

In New South Wales, there are different forums to have building disputes and claims addressed. The NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal handles building disputes particularly residential building work claims.  There are numerous claims prosecuted and defended in...

When should a business take legal action on an overdue account?

Generally speaking, an overdue account should be acted on promptly.  The longer it is left, the greater the likelihood the account will need to be written off. Unless the debtor has a satisfactory reason for delaying payment, the account should be followed...

Court Rules Against Kmart in Personal Injury Appeal

In a recent case, Kmart has been held liable for injuries sustained by a customer in its Woy Woy store, after a mountain bike in a heavy, oversized box fell from another customer's shopping trolley, injuring Ms Rita Marmara. The New South Wales Court of Appeal upheld...

Can a Shareholder claim against a Company?

A shareholder can claim against a company under some circumstances. Shareholders have specific rights and interests in a company, and there are scenarios where they might have grounds to make a claim. Some common situations include: Breach of Shareholder Agreement: If...

Court of Appeal Clarifies GP’s Duty of Care in Varipatis v Almario

In a landmark decision, the New South Wales Court of Appeal upheld the appeal of a general practitioner (GP) who was previously found negligent for not referring a morbidly obese patient for bariatric surgery. The case, Varipatis v Almario [2013] NSWCA 76, provides...