How Vicissitudes Impact Future Economic Loss in Legal Cases

Nov 24, 2023 | Publication

When it comes to calculating future economic loss in legal cases, one concept that often arises is “vicissitudes.” But what exactly are vicissitudes, and how do they affect the compensation awarded to plaintiffs? In this article, we’ll delve into the definition of vicissitudes, explore the standard percentage applied, and identify situations where the usual percentage may not be applied.

What Are Vicissitudes?

Vicissitudes, in legal terms, refer to “a change of circumstances or fortune.” When a plaintiff is seeking damages in a legal case, it’s important to consider the potential changes in their circumstances and financial fortune in the future. In essence, it involves assessing how life’s uncertainties can impact the calculation of future economic loss.

The Role of Vicissitudes in Legal Cases

Vicissitudes play a crucial role in legal cases, particularly when determining future economic loss. To ensure a fair and accurate calculation of damages, the Civil Liability Act in many jurisdictions mandates that courts consider vicissitudes when awarding compensation.

The Standard Deduction for Vicissitudes

One of the key aspects of vicissitudes in legal cases is the standard deduction applied. In most cases, a 15% deduction is the norm when calculating future economic loss. This means that when estimating the financial impact of an injury or loss, courts typically reduce the potential compensation by 15% to account for the inherent uncertainties in life.

Exceptions to the Standard Percentage

While a 15% deduction is the standard practice, there are situations in which the usual percentage may not be applied. One notable exception is when the plaintiff is nearing retirement age, and unexpected adverse vicissitudes of life are less likely to occur.

In such cases, a smaller deduction may be deemed appropriate. Courts may take into consideration the reduced probability of significant future changes in the plaintiff’s circumstances, as retirement age often marks a transition to a more stable financial phase of life.

It’s important to note that the determination of the appropriate deduction for vicissitudes is a complex process, and courts weigh various factors, including the plaintiff’s age, occupation, and the nature of the injury or loss when making this assessment.

The information in this publication is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavour to provide accurate and timely information, we do not guarantee that the information in this publication is accurate at the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. We are not responsible for the information of any source to which a link is provided or reference is made and exclude all liability in connection with use of these sources. If you do not wish to receive newsletters from us, please let us know.

Latest Insights

How does the court assess pain and suffering?

In New South Wales (NSW), the assessment of pain and suffering—referred to legally as non-economic loss—is governed by the Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) ("CLA"). This is compensation for the intangible effects of the injury, such as pain and suffering, loss of...

Property Disputes – How Can They Arise?

Property disputes arise in many different ways – not only in commercial contexts but also in residential settings.  Some of the types of property disputes include:...

Can a Child under 14 years commit a Crime?

In New South Wales, the age of criminal responsibility is 10 years old.  A child under 10 cannot be charged with a criminal offence. For children aged 10 to under 14, there is a legal presumption known as doli incapax, which assumes the child is incapable of...

Why is it important to know who your client is?

In a range of contexts, it is important to know who your client is. In most professional service contexts, the identity of the client is the starting point to providing advice.  If it is not clear who the professional advisor is advising, this can cause issues as...

Mental Harm Damages Following Birth Trauma: Lessons from Sorbello

In South Western Sydney Local Health District v Sorbello [2024] NSWCA 14, the New South Wales Court of Appeal has provided timely guidance on two important issues in personal injury litigation: how courts choose between competing expert opinions on mental harm, and...

Damages for Defamation – Newman v Whittington [2025] NSWSC 275

A family dispute resolution practitioner was awarded $150,000 in aggravated damages, $10,000 in interest, and an injunction in a recent Supreme Court of New South Wales case. The defendant posted defamatory statements about the plaintiff on WordPress, Facebook, and...

Review Panel Determines Right Hand Injury as Non-Threshold Injury

The Personal Injury Commission (PIC) has ruled in Tasseli v Insurance Australia Limited t/as NRMA Insurance [2025] NSWPICMP 49 that damage to pre-existing surgical hardware constitutes a non-threshold injury, entitling the Claimant to ongoing statutory benefits and...

What are 5 legal requirements for a business?

When a new business is set up, there are various legal aspects which should be considered.  Some are more important than others in the early stages.  Obviously the nature of the business will dictate more specific legal requirements. We set out below some...

Court Dismisses Group Proceeding

A significant class action against Waller Legal Pty Ltd has been halted after the Supreme Court of Victoria ruled that the proceeding should no longer continue as a group proceeding. The case, Jane Jones (a pseudonym) v Waller Legal Pty Ltd [2025] VSC 42, involved...