Patient sues doctor after post-surgical complications, claiming it could have been avoided had an alternative been properly explained

May 22, 2023 | Publication

In the recent decision of Hamlyn v Stanton (No. 3)  NSWDC 632, the plaintiff, Mr Hamlyn, was diagnosed with prostate cancer at the start of 2017. He was informed by his Urologist and the defendant in this matter, Dr Stanton, that active treatment was needed. Upon hearing Dr Stanton’s advice, the plaintiff elected to have surgery to remove the cancer.

Following this procedure the plaintiff suffered post-operative complications and claimed that if he had received a more thorough explanation of the alternative option of radiation therapy, and further a referral to a radiation oncologist, he would have chosen the alternative treatment opposed to surgery. The plaintiff proceeded to sue the defendant for damages for personal injury, in addition to non-compliance with the consumer guarantee of rendering services with due care and skill, under s 60 of the Australian Consumer Act

As Dr Stanton is regarded as a professional, the case largely turned on the application of s 5O of the Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW), which deals with the standard of care for professionals. Upon hearing expert urology evidence, in addition to the application of s 5O of the CLA to the facts, the court held that Dr Stanton did not breach his duty to inform the patient of the potential risks of surgery. Further, it was found that the defendant was not negligent in failing to refer the patient to a radiation oncologist for assessment. 

A verdict was found in favour of the defendant and the plaintiff was ordered to pay the defendants costs.

The decision can be read in full here:

The information in this publication is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavour to provide accurate and timely information, we do not guarantee that the information in this publication is accurate at the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. We are not responsible for the information of any source to which a link is provided or reference is made and exclude all liability in connection with use of these sources. If you do not wish to receive newsletters from us, please let us know.

Latest Insights

New Coercive Control Laws in NSW as of 1 July 2024

From 1 July 2024, coercive control will be a crime in NSW when a person uses abusive behaviours towards a current or former intimate partner with the intention to coerce or control them. The Crimes Legislation Amendment (Coercive Control) Act 2022makes it an...

Key Rules on Discovery Procedures for Prospective Defendants

Rules 5.2 and 5.3 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (UCPR) provide essential guidelines on discovery aimed at identifying or locating prospective defendants. These rules are instrumental in the pre-litigation process, ensuring that applicants can gather...

5 Ways A Director Can Be Sued

Directors can be sued for all sorts of reasons.  Here are 5 of them. Reason #1: Insolvent Trading A director can be sued if the company he or she is a director of trades whilst insolvent.  A director has a duty to prevent the company trading and incurring...

7 Ways to Enforce a Judgment

After a judgment is obtained for an amount of money, there are numerous options open to a judgment creditor in relation to how to enforce the judgment (i.e. how to obtain the money which is owed pursuant to the judgment). Option #1: Issue a Bankruptcy Notice If the...

Who Can Bring a Compensation to Relatives Claim?

In the unfortunate event of a loved one's passing due to negligence or wrongful act, the Compensation to Relatives Act 1897 in New South Wales outlines the parameters for pursuing compensation on behalf of the deceased. Understanding who has the legal standing to...

10 Myths of Being Sued

If you or your business are sued, there are many myths about how the legal process will pan out.  Here are 10 myths about the legal process – all are incorrect. Myth #1: The matter will definitely go to a hearing Most matters settle before a Judge decides...