Patient sues doctor after post-surgical complications, claiming it could have been avoided had an alternative been properly explained

May 22, 2023 | Publication

In the recent decision of Hamlyn v Stanton (No. 3)  NSWDC 632, the plaintiff, Mr Hamlyn, was diagnosed with prostate cancer at the start of 2017. He was informed by his Urologist and the defendant in this matter, Dr Stanton, that active treatment was needed. Upon hearing Dr Stanton’s advice, the plaintiff elected to have surgery to remove the cancer.

Following this procedure the plaintiff suffered post-operative complications and claimed that if he had received a more thorough explanation of the alternative option of radiation therapy, and further a referral to a radiation oncologist, he would have chosen the alternative treatment opposed to surgery. The plaintiff proceeded to sue the defendant for damages for personal injury, in addition to non-compliance with the consumer guarantee of rendering services with due care and skill, under s 60 of the Australian Consumer Act

As Dr Stanton is regarded as a professional, the case largely turned on the application of s 5O of the Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW), which deals with the standard of care for professionals. Upon hearing expert urology evidence, in addition to the application of s 5O of the CLA to the facts, the court held that Dr Stanton did not breach his duty to inform the patient of the potential risks of surgery. Further, it was found that the defendant was not negligent in failing to refer the patient to a radiation oncologist for assessment. 

A verdict was found in favour of the defendant and the plaintiff was ordered to pay the defendants costs.

The decision can be read in full here: https://www.caselaw.nsw.gov.au/decision/175529ca6c86a20fa73411b2

The information in this publication is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavour to provide accurate and timely information, we do not guarantee that the information in this publication is accurate at the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. We are not responsible for the information of any source to which a link is provided or reference is made and exclude all liability in connection with use of these sources. If you do not wish to receive newsletters from us, please let us know.

Latest Insights

The Rise of Generative AI in Law and the Need for Caution

Generative artificial intelligence (Gen AI), a subset of artificial intelligence focused on creating new content, has gained significant traction in various industries, including law. Capable of producing text, images, and audio, platforms like ChatGPT are among the...

Australia Introduces Statutory Tort for Serious Invasions of Privacy

The Australian legal landscape is about to undergo a significant transformation with the introduction of a statutory tort for serious invasions of privacy. This change comes with the passage of the Privacy and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2024 by the Commonwealth...

Building Disputes – Which Court or Tribunal Deals with Them?

In New South Wales, there are different forums to have building disputes and claims addressed. The NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal handles building disputes particularly residential building work claims.  There are numerous claims prosecuted and defended in...

When should a business take legal action on an overdue account?

Generally speaking, an overdue account should be acted on promptly.  The longer it is left, the greater the likelihood the account will need to be written off. Unless the debtor has a satisfactory reason for delaying payment, the account should be followed...

Court Rules Against Kmart in Personal Injury Appeal

In a recent case, Kmart has been held liable for injuries sustained by a customer in its Woy Woy store, after a mountain bike in a heavy, oversized box fell from another customer's shopping trolley, injuring Ms Rita Marmara. The New South Wales Court of Appeal upheld...

Can a Shareholder claim against a Company?

A shareholder can claim against a company under some circumstances. Shareholders have specific rights and interests in a company, and there are scenarios where they might have grounds to make a claim. Some common situations include: Breach of Shareholder Agreement: If...