Pick-packer wins appeal to recover damages for back injury

Aug 30, 2023 | Publication

Injured picker-packer, Mr Williams, successfully has decision of the District Court of NSW overturned in the NSW Court of Appeal.

Mr Williams was employed as a picker-packer in a product distribution centre operated by Metcash Trading Ltd when he sustained a back injury and associated psychological injury. This was a result of lifting two boxes of dog food onto a pick slot that was 1.4 metres high.

At first instance, the judge found Metcash Trading Ltd to have breached the duty of care in respect of the dimensions of the rack but ruled that the breach was not causative of the injury. The judge found the injury was caused solely by the plaintiff’s own conduct in lifting two boxes of Chum at a time and found contributory negligence. Had the claim been successful, the trial judge would have applied a 20% reduction due to contributory negligence.

Mr Williams appealed and was successful. The NSW Court of Appeal found that the primary judge’s finding on causation ‘was vitiated by the failure to consider whether the injury would not have occurred because a higher pick slot afforded the appellant an opportunity to employ a safer method of lifting that was impossible to use if the pick slot were only 1.4 meters (at ).’

Negligence was evident and the Court ruled that it was virtually impossible to pick the product using safe lifting and handling techniques prescribed by the employer. The appeal as to liability was upheld in favour of the plaintiff.

This case is noteworthy, due to its implications for both workers and employers. It highlights the extent to which the courts are willing to find contributory negligence sufficient to break the chain of causation between the employer’s negligence and the injury suffered. Further, it highlights the importance of safety standards and regard to the logistics of moving stock in warehouse – both for the safety of works and liability for employers.

The information in this publication is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavour to provide accurate and timely information, we do not guarantee that the information in this publication is accurate at the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. We are not responsible for the information of any source to which a link is provided or reference is made and exclude all liability in connection with use of these sources. If you do not wish to receive newsletters from us, please let us know.

Latest Insights

How does the court assess pain and suffering?

In New South Wales (NSW), the assessment of pain and suffering—referred to legally as non-economic loss—is governed by the Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) ("CLA"). This is compensation for the intangible effects of the injury, such as pain and suffering, loss of...

Property Disputes – How Can They Arise?

Property disputes arise in many different ways – not only in commercial contexts but also in residential settings.  Some of the types of property disputes include:...

Can a Child under 14 years commit a Crime?

In New South Wales, the age of criminal responsibility is 10 years old.  A child under 10 cannot be charged with a criminal offence. For children aged 10 to under 14, there is a legal presumption known as doli incapax, which assumes the child is incapable of...

Why is it important to know who your client is?

In a range of contexts, it is important to know who your client is. In most professional service contexts, the identity of the client is the starting point to providing advice.  If it is not clear who the professional advisor is advising, this can cause issues as...

Mental Harm Damages Following Birth Trauma: Lessons from Sorbello

In South Western Sydney Local Health District v Sorbello [2024] NSWCA 14, the New South Wales Court of Appeal has provided timely guidance on two important issues in personal injury litigation: how courts choose between competing expert opinions on mental harm, and...

Damages for Defamation – Newman v Whittington [2025] NSWSC 275

A family dispute resolution practitioner was awarded $150,000 in aggravated damages, $10,000 in interest, and an injunction in a recent Supreme Court of New South Wales case. The defendant posted defamatory statements about the plaintiff on WordPress, Facebook, and...

Review Panel Determines Right Hand Injury as Non-Threshold Injury

The Personal Injury Commission (PIC) has ruled in Tasseli v Insurance Australia Limited t/as NRMA Insurance [2025] NSWPICMP 49 that damage to pre-existing surgical hardware constitutes a non-threshold injury, entitling the Claimant to ongoing statutory benefits and...

What are 5 legal requirements for a business?

When a new business is set up, there are various legal aspects which should be considered.  Some are more important than others in the early stages.  Obviously the nature of the business will dictate more specific legal requirements. We set out below some...

Court Dismisses Group Proceeding

A significant class action against Waller Legal Pty Ltd has been halted after the Supreme Court of Victoria ruled that the proceeding should no longer continue as a group proceeding. The case, Jane Jones (a pseudonym) v Waller Legal Pty Ltd [2025] VSC 42, involved...