What happens when real estate is purchased and the property is damaged before settlement?

Jan 14, 2025 | Publication

When a property purchase contract is exchanged, as a general rule the risk of damage to the property typically passes to the purchaser. This means that if the property is damaged after the exchange of contracts but before settlement, the purchaser is generally responsible for the damage. However, there are several important potential exceptions.

The contract may provide that the property is at the purchaser’s risk from the date of exchange. However, parties can negotiate different terms, so it is crucial to review the specific contract.

Purchasers are advised to take out insurance on the property from the date of exchange to cover any potential damage. This is because the purchaser bears the risk of damage, and having insurance can mitigate financial loss.

Despite the risk passing to the buyer, the vendor is still obligated to maintain the property in the condition it was in at the time of exchange until settlement. If the vendor fails to do so, the purchaser may have a claim for breach of contract.

In rare cases, if the property is so severely damaged that it cannot be used for its intended purpose, the contract may be frustrated. This would discharge both parties from their obligations under the contract.

If there is a dispute over damage to the property, the purchaser may seek legal remedies such as specific performance, damages, or rescission of the contract, depending on the circumstances and the terms of the contract.

It is advisable for both purchaser and vendors to seek legal advice to understand their rights and obligations in the event of property damage after the exchange of contracts.

The information in this publication is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavour to provide accurate and timely information, we do not guarantee that the information in this publication is accurate at the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. We are not responsible for the information of any source to which a link is provided or reference is made and exclude all liability in connection with use of these sources. If you do not wish to receive newsletters from us, please let us know.nd exclude all liability in connection with use of these sources. If you do not wish to receive newsletters from us, please let us know.

Latest Insights

How can the risk of litigation be reduced?

The risk of litigation can impose significant financial, reputation and operational burdens on a business.  There are an array of areas where litigation can arise including in relation to contract disputes, employment issues, regulatory breaches, consumer...

How does the court assess pain and suffering?

In New South Wales (NSW), the assessment of pain and suffering—referred to legally as non-economic loss—is governed by the Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) ("CLA"). This is compensation for the intangible effects of the injury, such as pain and suffering, loss of...

Property Disputes – How Can They Arise?

Property disputes arise in many different ways – not only in commercial contexts but also in residential settings.  Some of the types of property disputes include:...

Can a Child under 14 years commit a Crime?

In New South Wales, the age of criminal responsibility is 10 years old.  A child under 10 cannot be charged with a criminal offence. For children aged 10 to under 14, there is a legal presumption known as doli incapax, which assumes the child is incapable of...

Why is it important to know who your client is?

In a range of contexts, it is important to know who your client is. In most professional service contexts, the identity of the client is the starting point to providing advice.  If it is not clear who the professional advisor is advising, this can cause issues as...

Mental Harm Damages Following Birth Trauma: Lessons from Sorbello

In South Western Sydney Local Health District v Sorbello [2024] NSWCA 14, the New South Wales Court of Appeal has provided timely guidance on two important issues in personal injury litigation: how courts choose between competing expert opinions on mental harm, and...

Damages for Defamation – Newman v Whittington [2025] NSWSC 275

A family dispute resolution practitioner was awarded $150,000 in aggravated damages, $10,000 in interest, and an injunction in a recent Supreme Court of New South Wales case. The defendant posted defamatory statements about the plaintiff on WordPress, Facebook, and...