What happens when real estate is purchased and the property is damaged before settlement?

Jan 14, 2025 | Publication

When a property purchase contract is exchanged, as a general rule the risk of damage to the property typically passes to the purchaser. This means that if the property is damaged after the exchange of contracts but before settlement, the purchaser is generally responsible for the damage. However, there are several important potential exceptions.

The contract may provide that the property is at the purchaser’s risk from the date of exchange. However, parties can negotiate different terms, so it is crucial to review the specific contract.

Purchasers are advised to take out insurance on the property from the date of exchange to cover any potential damage. This is because the purchaser bears the risk of damage, and having insurance can mitigate financial loss.

Despite the risk passing to the buyer, the vendor is still obligated to maintain the property in the condition it was in at the time of exchange until settlement. If the vendor fails to do so, the purchaser may have a claim for breach of contract.

In rare cases, if the property is so severely damaged that it cannot be used for its intended purpose, the contract may be frustrated. This would discharge both parties from their obligations under the contract.

If there is a dispute over damage to the property, the purchaser may seek legal remedies such as specific performance, damages, or rescission of the contract, depending on the circumstances and the terms of the contract.

It is advisable for both purchaser and vendors to seek legal advice to understand their rights and obligations in the event of property damage after the exchange of contracts.

The information in this publication is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavour to provide accurate and timely information, we do not guarantee that the information in this publication is accurate at the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. We are not responsible for the information of any source to which a link is provided or reference is made and exclude all liability in connection with use of these sources. If you do not wish to receive newsletters from us, please let us know.nd exclude all liability in connection with use of these sources. If you do not wish to receive newsletters from us, please let us know.

Latest Insights

McAuley Lawyers Expands to Penrith to Serve Western Sydney

McAuley Lawyers is pleased to announce the opening of its newest office in Penrith, expanding the firm’s presence across Greater Sydney and bringing its full range of legal services to one of the fastest-growing regions in New South Wales. The new office is located...

McAuley Lawyers Welcomes Roland Barros

McAuley Lawyers is pleased to announce that Roland Barros has joined the firm as a solicitor, bringing with him decades of legal experience and a strong reputation for providing practical and reliable legal advice. Admitted as a solicitor in 1978, Roland brings more...

Application for consent to vasectomy

A Western Australian Tribunal considered an application by the parents of a 23-year-old man, referred to as JC. They were seeking approval for a vasectomy under the Guardianship and Administration Act 1990 (WA). JC has a rare genetic condition that causes an...

NSW Government Strengthens Laws to Combat Crime and Corruption

The New South Wales Government has introduced a bill designed to strengthen the legal framework for investigating serious crime and corruption. The reforms aim to equip investigative agencies with more effective tools while carefully balancing privacy protections....