Who Can Bring a Compensation to Relatives Claim?

Mar 13, 2024 | Publication

In the unfortunate event of a loved one’s passing due to negligence or wrongful act, the Compensation to Relatives Act 1897 in New South Wales outlines the parameters for pursuing compensation on behalf of the deceased. Understanding who has the legal standing to initiate such claims is crucial for navigating the complexities of this legal process.

Executor or Administrator: The Primary Initiator

Section 4 of the Compensation to Relatives Act 1897 stipulates that the primary party authorised to commence and pursue a compensation claim is the executor or administrator of the deceased’s estate. This individual is entrusted with the responsibility of representing the deceased’s interests and seeking redress for any losses suffered by the deceased’s relatives as a result of their passing.

Alternatives in Absence of Executor or Administrator

In situations where there is no appointed executor or administrator, or if the designated party fails to initiate legal action within six months of the deceased’s demise, Section 6B of the Act allows any eligible beneficiary to bring forth the claim. Eligible beneficiaries, as defined in Section 4, encompass a broad spectrum of familial relations, including the spouse, siblings, parents, and children of the deceased.

Eligibility Criteria for Damages

For an individual to be entitled to damages under the Compensation to Relatives Act 1897, they must demonstrate, on the balance of probabilities, that they have suffered financial loss or been deprived of personal services as a result of the deceased’s death. This requirement underscores the necessity of establishing a causal link between the negligent act or misconduct and the resultant harm suffered by the claimant.

Understanding “Spouse” in Legal Context

The Act defines “spouse” not only as the legally wedded partner but also encompasses de facto relationships. This expansive definition ensures that individuals in both formal marriages and domestic partnerships are afforded equal recognition and protection under the law.

Practical Considerations in Commencing Proceedings

In practice, it is customary for the executor or administrator, or another responsible family member, such as the deceased’s spouse, to initiate legal proceedings on behalf of all eligible beneficiaries. This approach streamlines the process and ensures that the interests of all affected parties are adequately represented during the course of litigation.

In conclusion, the Compensation to Relatives Act 1897 serves as a crucial legal framework for seeking recourse and justice on behalf of individuals who have suffered loss or harm due to the wrongful actions of others. By understanding the provisions outlined within the Act and the eligibility criteria for initiating compensation claims, individuals can navigate the legal landscape with clarity and confidence during times of distress and uncertainty.

The information in this publication is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavour to provide accurate and timely information, we do not guarantee that the information in this publication is accurate at the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. We are not responsible for the information of any source to which a link is provided or reference is made and exclude all liability in connection with use of these sources. If you do not wish to receive newsletters from us, please let us know.

Latest Insights

The Rise of Generative AI in Law and the Need for Caution

Generative artificial intelligence (Gen AI), a subset of artificial intelligence focused on creating new content, has gained significant traction in various industries, including law. Capable of producing text, images, and audio, platforms like ChatGPT are among the...

Australia Introduces Statutory Tort for Serious Invasions of Privacy

The Australian legal landscape is about to undergo a significant transformation with the introduction of a statutory tort for serious invasions of privacy. This change comes with the passage of the Privacy and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2024 by the Commonwealth...

Building Disputes – Which Court or Tribunal Deals with Them?

In New South Wales, there are different forums to have building disputes and claims addressed. The NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal handles building disputes particularly residential building work claims.  There are numerous claims prosecuted and defended in...

When should a business take legal action on an overdue account?

Generally speaking, an overdue account should be acted on promptly.  The longer it is left, the greater the likelihood the account will need to be written off. Unless the debtor has a satisfactory reason for delaying payment, the account should be followed...

Court Rules Against Kmart in Personal Injury Appeal

In a recent case, Kmart has been held liable for injuries sustained by a customer in its Woy Woy store, after a mountain bike in a heavy, oversized box fell from another customer's shopping trolley, injuring Ms Rita Marmara. The New South Wales Court of Appeal upheld...

Can a Shareholder claim against a Company?

A shareholder can claim against a company under some circumstances. Shareholders have specific rights and interests in a company, and there are scenarios where they might have grounds to make a claim. Some common situations include: Breach of Shareholder Agreement: If...

Court of Appeal Clarifies GP’s Duty of Care in Varipatis v Almario

In a landmark decision, the New South Wales Court of Appeal upheld the appeal of a general practitioner (GP) who was previously found negligent for not referring a morbidly obese patient for bariatric surgery. The case, Varipatis v Almario [2013] NSWCA 76, provides...