Can you still make a claim?

Nov 17, 2023 | Publication

Many claims have limitation periods. A limitation period is a set time frame within which an aggrieved person must commence proceedings in a Court. These limitation periods generally commence from the date of the injury and/or incident. Some claims however, such as childhood sexual assault claims, do not have limitation periods. This extends to children who have suffered severe physical assault. 

The four main reasons for the institution of limitation periods are: ‘relevant evidence is likely to be lost with the passage of time; it is oppressive to a defendant to allow an action not be brought long after the circumstances which give rise to it have passed; defendants, including public institutions, should be able to utilise their resources on the basis that claims can no longer be made against them; and, there is a public interest in disputes being settled as quickly as possible’ (Brisbane South Regional Health Authority v Taylor HCA 25)

Generally speaking, personal injury claims have a limitation period of 3 years. That is, the injured person has three years from the date of injury to file a Statement of Claim with a Court for common law damages.

If you have suffered an injury however and the limitation period has passed, you may still be able to proceed with your claim by seeking an order pursuant to the Limitation Act 1969 to extend the time within which to commence proceedings. You, as the applicant, bear the onus of satisfying the Court that it is just and reasonable to grant an extension. 

The Court may consider whether such an extension would cause the defendant actual and significant prejudice, that is, when a defendant may be unable to fairly defend themselves. If the Court finds this, it will not grant an extension of time, however it is good to note that fair is not defined as ‘perfect or ideal’ (Commonwealth v Smith NSWCA 168).

The recent case of Winston v Commonwealth of Australia NSWSC 62 is a good example of this. Mr Winston was asleep on the HMAS Melbourne when it collided with another ship on 3 June 1969. Many of its crew were either killed or injured as a result. On 29 October 2019, Mr Winston filed a Statement of Claim (commenced proceedings) against the Commonwealth in relation to significant injuries resulting from the collision. Such injuries included PTSD, major depression and alcohol abuse. Clearly, the three-year limitation period had been exhausted and the Commonwealth sought that Mr Winston’s claim be barred pursuant to s14(1)(b) of the Limitation Act 1969.

The Court held however that it was both just and reasonable to order that the limitation period be extended up to and including the date upon which the Mr Winston filed the Statement of Claim.

The information in this publication is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavour to provide accurate and timely information, we do not guarantee that the information in this publication is accurate at the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. We are not responsible for the information of any source to which a link is provided or reference is made and exclude all liability in connection with use of these sources. If you do not wish to receive newsletters from us, please let us know.

Latest Insights

The Rise of Generative AI in Law and the Need for Caution

Generative artificial intelligence (Gen AI), a subset of artificial intelligence focused on creating new content, has gained significant traction in various industries, including law. Capable of producing text, images, and audio, platforms like ChatGPT are among the...

Australia Introduces Statutory Tort for Serious Invasions of Privacy

The Australian legal landscape is about to undergo a significant transformation with the introduction of a statutory tort for serious invasions of privacy. This change comes with the passage of the Privacy and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2024 by the Commonwealth...

Building Disputes – Which Court or Tribunal Deals with Them?

In New South Wales, there are different forums to have building disputes and claims addressed. The NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal handles building disputes particularly residential building work claims.  There are numerous claims prosecuted and defended in...

When should a business take legal action on an overdue account?

Generally speaking, an overdue account should be acted on promptly.  The longer it is left, the greater the likelihood the account will need to be written off. Unless the debtor has a satisfactory reason for delaying payment, the account should be followed...

Court Rules Against Kmart in Personal Injury Appeal

In a recent case, Kmart has been held liable for injuries sustained by a customer in its Woy Woy store, after a mountain bike in a heavy, oversized box fell from another customer's shopping trolley, injuring Ms Rita Marmara. The New South Wales Court of Appeal upheld...

Can a Shareholder claim against a Company?

A shareholder can claim against a company under some circumstances. Shareholders have specific rights and interests in a company, and there are scenarios where they might have grounds to make a claim. Some common situations include: Breach of Shareholder Agreement: If...