Coles worker awarded $828,554 in damages following injury at work

Feb 24, 2023 | Publication

Ms Filiposka has been awarded $828,554 in work injury damages proceedings claiming negligence against her employer, Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Ltd, in respect to a back injury she sustained in an awkward lifting incident whilst working as the manager in the delicatessen section.

On 31 December 2014, Ms Filiposka injured her back whilst lifting crates at work which varied from 10kg to 14.4kg. The store room where Ms Filiposka was required to lift the crates was a relatively confined and was crowded with stored food. She had to lift and move crates of chicken carcasses. She was required to do so without assistance in order to commence preparing the chicken carcasses for baking in readiness for sale to customers later that day.

In order to perform the task, Ms Filiposka had to stand in front of the cage in question, lean forward, lift each crate, and then in a twisting or turning movement, whilst holding and bearing the weight of each loaded crate, place them onto a small nearby mobile trolley table to transport the goods to another location.

The Court found that due to cost cutting budgetary measures, the delicatessen section of the Coles supermarket was significantly understaffed and Ms Filiposka received little to no training.

Ms Filiposka required surgery to her back and has been unable to work since the incident.

The decision can be read in full here: https://www.caselaw.nsw.gov.au/decision/1749e3e598d4e2bea9f5c5d9

The information in this publication is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavour to provide accurate and timely information, we do not guarantee that the information in this publication is accurate at the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. We are not responsible for the information of any source to which a link is provided or reference is made and exclude all liability in connection with use of these sources. If you do not wish to receive newsletters from us, please let us know.

Latest Insights

The Rise of Generative AI in Law and the Need for Caution

Generative artificial intelligence (Gen AI), a subset of artificial intelligence focused on creating new content, has gained significant traction in various industries, including law. Capable of producing text, images, and audio, platforms like ChatGPT are among the...

Australia Introduces Statutory Tort for Serious Invasions of Privacy

The Australian legal landscape is about to undergo a significant transformation with the introduction of a statutory tort for serious invasions of privacy. This change comes with the passage of the Privacy and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2024 by the Commonwealth...

Building Disputes – Which Court or Tribunal Deals with Them?

In New South Wales, there are different forums to have building disputes and claims addressed. The NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal handles building disputes particularly residential building work claims.  There are numerous claims prosecuted and defended in...

When should a business take legal action on an overdue account?

Generally speaking, an overdue account should be acted on promptly.  The longer it is left, the greater the likelihood the account will need to be written off. Unless the debtor has a satisfactory reason for delaying payment, the account should be followed...

Court Rules Against Kmart in Personal Injury Appeal

In a recent case, Kmart has been held liable for injuries sustained by a customer in its Woy Woy store, after a mountain bike in a heavy, oversized box fell from another customer's shopping trolley, injuring Ms Rita Marmara. The New South Wales Court of Appeal upheld...

Can a Shareholder claim against a Company?

A shareholder can claim against a company under some circumstances. Shareholders have specific rights and interests in a company, and there are scenarios where they might have grounds to make a claim. Some common situations include: Breach of Shareholder Agreement: If...

Court of Appeal Clarifies GP’s Duty of Care in Varipatis v Almario

In a landmark decision, the New South Wales Court of Appeal upheld the appeal of a general practitioner (GP) who was previously found negligent for not referring a morbidly obese patient for bariatric surgery. The case, Varipatis v Almario [2013] NSWCA 76, provides...