Doctors Failure to Recognise Infection Causes Life-long Impairment to 1 Year Old Baby

Nov 15, 2023 | Publication

The plaintiff, by their next friend sued the Child and Adolescent Health Services in relation to injuries suffered while a patient at Princess Margaret Hospital in 2005. The plaintiff, only a mere 16 months at the time, was being treated for superficial and partial thickness burns to approximately 18% of her total body surface area. The burns were caused by an unfortunate accident involving hot water. As a consequence of the burns, the plaintiff developed Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (“ARDS”). The ARDS, which is an inflammatory lung injury, caused the 16-month-old to suffer cardiac arrest, multi-organ failure, brain damage and cerebral palsy. The plaintiff claimed that the injuries were caused by the negligence of the doctors in the burns ward who were responsible for the care of the plaintiff.

At first instance, the learned trial judge found in favour of the plaintiff. The defendants appealed. The Hospital relied on grounds of appeal that fall under two broad issues. The first was over a finding of fact on the first instance. That finding related to the finding that development of ADRS was due to Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) in the presence of sepsis. The plaintiff argued if sepsis was present, it could have been treated by the Hospital with antibiotics, potentially avoiding the development of ADRS. The opposing argument, however, was that if sepsis was not present and the ARDS was developed due to the burns alone, then it was out of the control of the hospital as antibiotics would have made no difference. The second issue related to whether the hospital in fact breached their duty of care, which resulted in careful consideration of the application of the Civil Liability Act 2002 (WA). Ultimately, the appeal was unanimously dismissed, with the Court finding the grounds of appeal had no merits.

The decision of Child and Adolescent Health Service v Sunday John Mabior by next friend Mary Kelei WASCA 151 can be read in full here <http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/wa/WASCA/2019/151.html.>.

The information in this publication is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavour to provide accurate and timely information, we do not guarantee that the information in this publication is accurate at the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. We are not responsible for the information of any source to which a link is provided or reference is made and exclude all liability in connection with use of these sources. If you do not wish to receive newsletters from us, please let us know.

Latest Insights

Partnership Disputes – Causes and Resolution

Partnerships are a common business structure.  Frequently we see disputes where one or more partners wishes to leave the partnership, and financial and other disputes relating to a partnership.  Understanding the causes of these disputes and how they can be...

What Types of Claims can be made on a Deceased Estate?

A deceased estate has a range of potential claims that can be made against it.  These arise not only from the actions of the deceased but also from legislation that deals with how deceased estates are administered and distributed. Some examples of potential...

Fundamentals of Companies – Getting the Basics Right

A company is a separate legal entity, being an artificial person that only ceases to exist via the hands of its members or via government intervention.  A company’s personality is expressed in its constitution and enables the members of the company to combine...

Loss of chance

In the landmark decision of Tabet v Gett [2010] 240 CLR 537, the High Court of Australia provided crucial insights into the principles of causation in negligence claims. This case is pivotal for understanding how courts assess the direct link between alleged...

Webinar – How to Reduce the Risk of a Claim on Your Estate

Join us for an informative seminar on "How to Reduce the Risk of a Claim on Your Estate" via Zoom on Thursday, 5 September at 8 pm. This one-hour complimentary session, including a Q&A segment, will provide valuable insights and practical strategies to safeguard...

New Industrial Manslaughter laws in NSW

The Industrial Manslaughter Bill has passed NSW Parliament and will make industrial manslaugther an offence. According to the NSW government, since 2019 more than 300 workers have been killed in NSW.  Under the new law, a business or individual can be held...

8 Types of People that can Claim on a Deceased Estate

In New South Wales, there are many different types of people that can potentially claim on a deceased estate if, for instance, inadequate or no provision has been made for them or they are owed money by the estate (or they were owed money by the deceased).  ...

What is the difference between Joint Tenancy and Tenants in Common?

A very important difference in ownership of property where there are two or more owners is Joint Tenancy v Tenants in Common. It is essential to understand the difference when and if you buy property with another person. If you own a property as Joint Tenants and one...