Does your Doctor owe you a duty to disclose an “adverse event” following treatment?

Feb 16, 2023 | Publication

A doctor has a duty to disclose to you an adverse event if the usual practice is for the doctor to disclose the adverse event.

A doctor’s duty to inform patients of treatment that has been given or will be given is integral to the provision of medical care and treatment. As Bryson J once stated “One cannot stick a needle into a person and walk away wordless, as one would with a horse.”

In Wighton v Arnot NSWSC 637 the plaintiff developed a lump on the right side of her neck requiring multiple surgeries by the defendant. The plaintiff alleged that during the surgical procedures, her doctor severed her right spinal accessory nerve and that his treatment thereafter was negligent in that he failed to inform the plaintiff of his suspicion that he had severed the nerve, and failed to refer the plaintiff to an appropriate specialist. When the plaintiff eventually saw a neurosurgeon, an accessory nerve reconstruction was no longer feasible.

The court found that the treating doctor owed a duty to disclose given his suspicion that he had severed the plaintiff’s nerve as this was a relevant part of the patient’s medical outcome and was a necessary part of reasonable aftercare.

The court also considered that the duty extended to an obligation for the doctor to undertake investigations given an adverse outcome was suspected.

There was no finding that the doctor had been negligent in the performance of the operation generally, nor in severing the nerve. Liability only arose through the failure to disclose the adverse outcome to the patient, where it was usual practice for the doctor to disclose and investigate the suspected adverse event and provide an opportunity for remedial surgery.

If you believe that you were denied a better medical outcome due to your doctors’ failure to disclose an adverse event contact McAuley Lawyers to speak to an experienced compensation lawyer.

The information in this publication is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavour to provide accurate and timely information, we do not guarantee that the information in this publication is accurate at the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. We are not responsible for the information of any source to which a link is provided or reference is made and exclude all liability in connection with use of these sources. If you do not wish to receive newsletters from us, please let us know.

Latest Insights

The Rise of Generative AI in Law and the Need for Caution

Generative artificial intelligence (Gen AI), a subset of artificial intelligence focused on creating new content, has gained significant traction in various industries, including law. Capable of producing text, images, and audio, platforms like ChatGPT are among the...

Australia Introduces Statutory Tort for Serious Invasions of Privacy

The Australian legal landscape is about to undergo a significant transformation with the introduction of a statutory tort for serious invasions of privacy. This change comes with the passage of the Privacy and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2024 by the Commonwealth...

Building Disputes – Which Court or Tribunal Deals with Them?

In New South Wales, there are different forums to have building disputes and claims addressed. The NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal handles building disputes particularly residential building work claims.  There are numerous claims prosecuted and defended in...

When should a business take legal action on an overdue account?

Generally speaking, an overdue account should be acted on promptly.  The longer it is left, the greater the likelihood the account will need to be written off. Unless the debtor has a satisfactory reason for delaying payment, the account should be followed...

Court Rules Against Kmart in Personal Injury Appeal

In a recent case, Kmart has been held liable for injuries sustained by a customer in its Woy Woy store, after a mountain bike in a heavy, oversized box fell from another customer's shopping trolley, injuring Ms Rita Marmara. The New South Wales Court of Appeal upheld...

Can a Shareholder claim against a Company?

A shareholder can claim against a company under some circumstances. Shareholders have specific rights and interests in a company, and there are scenarios where they might have grounds to make a claim. Some common situations include: Breach of Shareholder Agreement: If...