High-Stakes Rodeo Legal Showdown: Landmark Decision in Tapp v Australian Bushmen’s Campdraft & Rodeo Association Reshapes Risk Assessment in Extreme Sports

Mar 5, 2024 | Publication

In a precedent-setting ruling, the High Court of Australia delivered a significant decision in the case of Tapp v Australian Bushmen’s Campdraft & Rodeo Association Limited [2022] HCA 11, reshaping the landscape of liability in recreational activities.

The case revolved around an incident during a campdrafting competition, a sport involving horseback riders working with cattle. The appellant, while participating in the competition, suffered injuries when her horse slipped on the arena surface, causing both horse and rider to fall.

Central to the case was the interpretation of the Civil Liability Act (CLA) regarding obvious risks in dangerous recreational activities. While campdrafting is acknowledged as inherently risky under s. 5K of the CLA, the appellant argued that her injury stemmed from a risk not considered obvious under s. 5L.

Prior to the appellant’s fall, four other competitors had also fallen from their horses, prompting concerns about the slippery ground. Despite this, the competition proceeded. The High Court determined that the risk in question was the danger of falling from a horse due to the surface of the arena substantially deteriorating beyond normal expectations.

Crucially, the Court ruled that for the defendant to rely on s. 5L, they needed to prove that this specific risk was obvious to the appellant. However, the appellant was unaware of the prior falls, did not inspect the arena, and had safely competed earlier in the day with her family.

The Court emphasised that a reasonable person in the defendant’s position should have taken immediate action to address the substantially elevated risk, such as halting the event, especially considering the prior falls. Failure to do so constituted negligence on the part of the defendant.

This decision underscores the duty of organizers of recreational activities to ensure participant safety by promptly addressing foreseeable risks. It sets a precedent for assessing liability in similar contexts, highlighting the importance of proactive risk management to prevent injuries.

The ruling serves as a reminder to all organisers of recreational activities to prioritize participant safety and take swift action in response to heightened risks, ultimately contributing to a safer and more responsible recreational environment.

The information in this publication is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavour to provide accurate and timely information, we do not guarantee that the information in this publication is accurate at the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. We are not responsible for the information of any source to which a link is provided or reference is made and exclude all liability in connection with use of these sources. If you do not wish to receive newsletters from us, please let us know.

Latest Insights

7 Ways to Enforce a Judgment

After a judgment is obtained for an amount of money, there are numerous options open to a judgment creditor in relation to how to enforce the judgment (i.e. how to obtain the money which is owed pursuant to the judgment). Option #1: Issue a Bankruptcy Notice If the...

Who Can Bring a Compensation to Relatives Claim?

In the unfortunate event of a loved one's passing due to negligence or wrongful act, the Compensation to Relatives Act 1897 in New South Wales outlines the parameters for pursuing compensation on behalf of the deceased. Understanding who has the legal standing to...

10 Myths of Being Sued

If you or your business are sued, there are many myths about how the legal process will pan out.  Here are 10 myths about the legal process – all are incorrect. Myth #1: The matter will definitely go to a hearing Most matters settle before a Judge decides...

How can my business sue someone to recover money?

Lawyers are often asked about the process of recovering money owed as a result of, for instance, a failure to pay for goods or services or a breach of contract. Normally a business (or an individual) will issue a letter of demand as a precursor to suing someone to...

Can a Will be done electronically – not on paper?

Can a Will be valid if it is found on a computer (i.e. not signed with pen and in a hard copy form)? The Supreme Court of South Australia recently examined the validity of an electronic Will created on an iPad and signed using an iPad pen. The decision of In the...

Landmark Decision: Melenewycz v Whitfield [2015] NSWSC 1482

In a significant legal precedent, the New South Wales Supreme Court addressed the applicability of blameless accident provisions in motor accident compensation cases, specifically concerning single-vehicle accidents. The case of Melenewycz v Whitfield [2015] NSWSC...