Make your opponent pay all your legal costs

Nov 22, 2022 | Publication | 0 comments

An important part of running Court cases is maximising the chances of your opponent paying your legal costs.

Recovery of legal costs

A successful party to litigation, in NSW, generally only recovers, at best, 60% to 70% of their incurred legal costs.

However outlined below is one method that, if employed correctly, can enable a successful party to recover up to 100% of their legal costs.

Maximising recovery

The Court Rules in NSW state that if an offer is made by a plaintiff, but not accepted by the defendant, and the plaintiff obtains an outcome no less favourable to the plaintiff than the terms of the offer, the plaintiff is entitled to an order against the defendant for the plaintiff’s costs assessed on an indemnity basis from when the offer was made (Rule 42.14 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005).

If a defendant makes an offer but it is not accepted by the plaintiff, and the plaintiff obtain an order or judgment no more favourable to the plaintiff than the terms of the offer, the defendant is entitled to an order for the defendant’s costs assessed on the indemnity basis from when the offer was made (Rule 42.15 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005).

The offer needs to be carefully expressed and in the correct form otherwise the offer may not invoke the relevant provisions in the Rules.

From a tactical viewpoint, a carefully made offer can:

  1. Place maximum pressure on the opposing party because the opposing party will be concerned that if they do not achieve a better result at trial, they will, most likely, be ordered to pay all your legal costs; and
  2. Result in your opponent paying all your legal costs following the trial.

The Rules concerning how offers need to be made are highly technical and experienced legal advice is paramount.

A skilful offer, made at the right time, can change the course of litigation.

The information in this email is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavour to provide accurate and timely information, we do not guarantee that the information in this publication is accurate at the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. We are not responsible for the information of any source to which a link is provided or reference is made and exclude all liability in connection with use of these sources.

Latest Insights

The Rise of Generative AI in Law and the Need for Caution

Generative artificial intelligence (Gen AI), a subset of artificial intelligence focused on creating new content, has gained significant traction in various industries, including law. Capable of producing text, images, and audio, platforms like ChatGPT are among the...

Australia Introduces Statutory Tort for Serious Invasions of Privacy

The Australian legal landscape is about to undergo a significant transformation with the introduction of a statutory tort for serious invasions of privacy. This change comes with the passage of the Privacy and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2024 by the Commonwealth...

Building Disputes – Which Court or Tribunal Deals with Them?

In New South Wales, there are different forums to have building disputes and claims addressed. The NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal handles building disputes particularly residential building work claims.  There are numerous claims prosecuted and defended in...

When should a business take legal action on an overdue account?

Generally speaking, an overdue account should be acted on promptly.  The longer it is left, the greater the likelihood the account will need to be written off. Unless the debtor has a satisfactory reason for delaying payment, the account should be followed...

Court Rules Against Kmart in Personal Injury Appeal

In a recent case, Kmart has been held liable for injuries sustained by a customer in its Woy Woy store, after a mountain bike in a heavy, oversized box fell from another customer's shopping trolley, injuring Ms Rita Marmara. The New South Wales Court of Appeal upheld...

Can a Shareholder claim against a Company?

A shareholder can claim against a company under some circumstances. Shareholders have specific rights and interests in a company, and there are scenarios where they might have grounds to make a claim. Some common situations include: Breach of Shareholder Agreement: If...

Court of Appeal Clarifies GP’s Duty of Care in Varipatis v Almario

In a landmark decision, the New South Wales Court of Appeal upheld the appeal of a general practitioner (GP) who was previously found negligent for not referring a morbidly obese patient for bariatric surgery. The case, Varipatis v Almario [2013] NSWCA 76, provides...