Navigating Compensation Claims: Understanding the Interplay Between the Compensation to Relatives Act and the Civil Liability Act

Mar 21, 2024 | Publication

When it comes to navigating compensation claims, understanding the intricate interplay between different statutes is crucial. In certain circumstances, claims under the Compensation to the Relatives Act are subject to the provisions of the Civil Liability Act (CLA). However, the decision of Taylor v Owners Strata Plan No 11564 (2014) 306 ALR 547 sheds light on a specific aspect of the CLA, providing clarity on its application.

Section 12 of the Civil Liability Act deals with damages for past or future economic loss, setting a maximum threshold for loss of earnings or earning capacity. Specifically, subsection (2) of this section instructs the court to disregard any amount by which the claimant’s gross weekly earnings would have exceeded three times the average weekly earnings at the time of the award.

The interpretation of this provision, particularly its application to claims under the Compensation to Relatives Act, came under scrutiny in the case of Taylor v Owners Strata Plan No 11564 (2014) 306 ALR 547. The High Court’s ruling in this case provided essential clarification on the scope of section 12(2) of the CLA.

In Taylor v Owners Strata Plan No 11564, the High Court elucidated that section 12(2) of the CLA applies specifically to claims for personal injury damages brought by or on behalf of high-earning individuals. The court emphasised that the provision does not extend to claims made by the relatives of such individuals under the Compensation to Relatives Act.

Central to the court’s reasoning was the literal interpretation of the term “claimant’s gross weekly earnings” in section 12(2) of the CLA. The majority opinion upheld that this term should be understood at face value, meaning that it pertains solely to the earnings of the individual making the claim. Consequently, the limitation imposed by section 12(2) does not require the court to disregard the earnings of the deceased relative above three times the average weekly earnings when assessing damages under the Compensation to Relatives Act.

This interpretation provides essential clarity for legal practitioners and individuals involved in compensation claims under the Compensation to Relatives Act. By delineating the scope of section 12(2) of the CLA, the High Court’s ruling in Taylor v Owners Strata Plan No 11564 establishes a clear framework for assessing damages in such cases.

In essence, while the provisions of the CLA may have implications for certain compensation claims, it is imperative to recognise the nuanced application of its provisions. Understanding the interplay between statutes such as the Compensation to Relatives Act and the Civil Liability Act is essential for ensuring equitable outcomes in compensation cases. The clarification provided by the High Court serves as a guiding beacon for legal practitioners and stakeholders navigating the complex landscape of compensation law.

The information in this publication is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavour to provide accurate and timely information, we do not guarantee that the information in this publication is accurate at the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. We are not responsible for the information of any source to which a link is provided or reference is made and exclude all liability in connection with use of these sources. If you do not wish to receive newsletters from us, please let us know.

Latest Insights

Webinar – How to Reduce the Risk of a Claim on Your Estate

Join us for an informative seminar on "How to Reduce the Risk of a Claim on Your Estate" via Zoom on Thursday, 5 September at 8 pm. This one-hour complimentary session, including a Q&A segment, will provide valuable insights and practical strategies to safeguard...

New Industrial Manslaughter laws in NSW

The Industrial Manslaughter Bill has passed NSW Parliament and will make industrial manslaugther an offence. According to the NSW government, since 2019 more than 300 workers have been killed in NSW.  Under the new law, a business or individual can be held...

8 Types of People that can Claim on a Deceased Estate

In New South Wales, there are many different types of people that can potentially claim on a deceased estate if, for instance, inadequate or no provision has been made for them or they are owed money by the estate (or they were owed money by the deceased).  ...

What is the difference between Joint Tenancy and Tenants in Common?

A very important difference in ownership of property where there are two or more owners is Joint Tenancy v Tenants in Common. It is essential to understand the difference when and if you buy property with another person. If you own a property as Joint Tenants and one...

New Coercive Control Laws in NSW as of 1 July 2024

From 1 July 2024, coercive control will be a crime in NSW when a person uses abusive behaviours towards a current or former intimate partner with the intention to coerce or control them. The Crimes Legislation Amendment (Coercive Control) Act 2022makes it an...

Key Rules on Discovery Procedures for Prospective Defendants

Rules 5.2 and 5.3 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (UCPR) provide essential guidelines on discovery aimed at identifying or locating prospective defendants. These rules are instrumental in the pre-litigation process, ensuring that applicants can gather...