Navigating Compensation Claims: Understanding the Interplay Between the Compensation to Relatives Act and the Civil Liability Act

Mar 21, 2024 | Publication

When it comes to navigating compensation claims, understanding the intricate interplay between different statutes is crucial. In certain circumstances, claims under the Compensation to the Relatives Act are subject to the provisions of the Civil Liability Act (CLA). However, the decision of Taylor v Owners Strata Plan No 11564 (2014) 306 ALR 547 sheds light on a specific aspect of the CLA, providing clarity on its application.

Section 12 of the Civil Liability Act deals with damages for past or future economic loss, setting a maximum threshold for loss of earnings or earning capacity. Specifically, subsection (2) of this section instructs the court to disregard any amount by which the claimant’s gross weekly earnings would have exceeded three times the average weekly earnings at the time of the award.

The interpretation of this provision, particularly its application to claims under the Compensation to Relatives Act, came under scrutiny in the case of Taylor v Owners Strata Plan No 11564 (2014) 306 ALR 547. The High Court’s ruling in this case provided essential clarification on the scope of section 12(2) of the CLA.

In Taylor v Owners Strata Plan No 11564, the High Court elucidated that section 12(2) of the CLA applies specifically to claims for personal injury damages brought by or on behalf of high-earning individuals. The court emphasised that the provision does not extend to claims made by the relatives of such individuals under the Compensation to Relatives Act.

Central to the court’s reasoning was the literal interpretation of the term “claimant’s gross weekly earnings” in section 12(2) of the CLA. The majority opinion upheld that this term should be understood at face value, meaning that it pertains solely to the earnings of the individual making the claim. Consequently, the limitation imposed by section 12(2) does not require the court to disregard the earnings of the deceased relative above three times the average weekly earnings when assessing damages under the Compensation to Relatives Act.

This interpretation provides essential clarity for legal practitioners and individuals involved in compensation claims under the Compensation to Relatives Act. By delineating the scope of section 12(2) of the CLA, the High Court’s ruling in Taylor v Owners Strata Plan No 11564 establishes a clear framework for assessing damages in such cases.

In essence, while the provisions of the CLA may have implications for certain compensation claims, it is imperative to recognise the nuanced application of its provisions. Understanding the interplay between statutes such as the Compensation to Relatives Act and the Civil Liability Act is essential for ensuring equitable outcomes in compensation cases. The clarification provided by the High Court serves as a guiding beacon for legal practitioners and stakeholders navigating the complex landscape of compensation law.

The information in this publication is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavour to provide accurate and timely information, we do not guarantee that the information in this publication is accurate at the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. We are not responsible for the information of any source to which a link is provided or reference is made and exclude all liability in connection with use of these sources. If you do not wish to receive newsletters from us, please let us know.

Latest Insights

7 Ways to Enforce a Judgment

After a judgment is obtained for an amount of money, there are numerous options open to a judgment creditor in relation to how to enforce the judgment (i.e. how to obtain the money which is owed pursuant to the judgment). Option #1: Issue a Bankruptcy Notice If the...

Who Can Bring a Compensation to Relatives Claim?

In the unfortunate event of a loved one's passing due to negligence or wrongful act, the Compensation to Relatives Act 1897 in New South Wales outlines the parameters for pursuing compensation on behalf of the deceased. Understanding who has the legal standing to...

10 Myths of Being Sued

If you or your business are sued, there are many myths about how the legal process will pan out.  Here are 10 myths about the legal process – all are incorrect. Myth #1: The matter will definitely go to a hearing Most matters settle before a Judge decides...

How can my business sue someone to recover money?

Lawyers are often asked about the process of recovering money owed as a result of, for instance, a failure to pay for goods or services or a breach of contract. Normally a business (or an individual) will issue a letter of demand as a precursor to suing someone to...

Can a Will be done electronically – not on paper?

Can a Will be valid if it is found on a computer (i.e. not signed with pen and in a hard copy form)? The Supreme Court of South Australia recently examined the validity of an electronic Will created on an iPad and signed using an iPad pen. The decision of In the...

Landmark Decision: Melenewycz v Whitfield [2015] NSWSC 1482

In a significant legal precedent, the New South Wales Supreme Court addressed the applicability of blameless accident provisions in motor accident compensation cases, specifically concerning single-vehicle accidents. The case of Melenewycz v Whitfield [2015] NSWSC...