Teacher convicted for failing to report sexual abuse of a child

Nov 6, 2023 | Publication

Teacher, Mr Webb of Trinity College Perth, was unsuccessful in his appeal against his conviction of failing to report sexual abuse of a child in a decision delivered on 13 October 2021.

In April 2017, a group of boys from the school went on a school rugby trip to Japan. Mr Webb was one of three teachers who accompanied the boys on the rugby trip.

On 11 April 2017, one of the boys, AB, was assaulted by a group of boys. In the course of the assault, the boys held AB down, removed his underwear and penetrated his anus with an object. AB later discovered that the object was a carrot. There was no contest at trial that AB was assaulted in the manner that he described.

Mr Webb did not report the incident in the form required by the Children and Community Services Act 2004 (WA). The incident was ultimately reported by the Acting Headmaster of the school.

The issue at trial was whether the appellant ‘believe on reasonable grounds’ that AB had been the subject of sexual abuse. That is, whether Mr Webb had a subjective state of mind inclining towards assent to, rather than rejecting, the proposition that AB had been the subject of sexual abuse.

The Court found Mr Webb guilty of being a teacher who in the course of his work as a teacher formed the belief on reasonable grounds that a child had been the subject of sexual abuse, he failed to report that belief as soon as practicable after forming the belief, contrary to s 124B of the Children and Community Services Act 2004 (WA).

His Honour entered a judgment of conviction, imposed a fine of $1,200 and made a spent conviction order.

On appeal the Court held that to the extent that Mr Webb teacher’s interview contained denials of the Mr Webb’s positive belief, those denials must be rejected in light of all of the circumstances. Those denials could not, when considered in light of all of the circumstances, give rise to a reasonable inference consistent with innocence. The learned magistrate was therefore correct to conclude that the only reasonable inference was that Mr Webb formed the requisite belief and that it was on reasonable grounds.

The case of Webb v Tang WASC 344 can be read in full here <https://jade.io/article/841410.

The information in this publication is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavour to provide accurate and timely information, we do not guarantee that the information in this publication is accurate at the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. We are not responsible for the information of any source to which a link is provided or reference is made and exclude all liability in connection with use of these sources. If you do not wish to receive newsletters from us, please let us know.

Latest Insights

How does the court assess pain and suffering?

In New South Wales (NSW), the assessment of pain and suffering—referred to legally as non-economic loss—is governed by the Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) ("CLA"). This is compensation for the intangible effects of the injury, such as pain and suffering, loss of...

Property Disputes – How Can They Arise?

Property disputes arise in many different ways – not only in commercial contexts but also in residential settings.  Some of the types of property disputes include:...

Can a Child under 14 years commit a Crime?

In New South Wales, the age of criminal responsibility is 10 years old.  A child under 10 cannot be charged with a criminal offence. For children aged 10 to under 14, there is a legal presumption known as doli incapax, which assumes the child is incapable of...

Why is it important to know who your client is?

In a range of contexts, it is important to know who your client is. In most professional service contexts, the identity of the client is the starting point to providing advice.  If it is not clear who the professional advisor is advising, this can cause issues as...

Mental Harm Damages Following Birth Trauma: Lessons from Sorbello

In South Western Sydney Local Health District v Sorbello [2024] NSWCA 14, the New South Wales Court of Appeal has provided timely guidance on two important issues in personal injury litigation: how courts choose between competing expert opinions on mental harm, and...

Damages for Defamation – Newman v Whittington [2025] NSWSC 275

A family dispute resolution practitioner was awarded $150,000 in aggravated damages, $10,000 in interest, and an injunction in a recent Supreme Court of New South Wales case. The defendant posted defamatory statements about the plaintiff on WordPress, Facebook, and...

Review Panel Determines Right Hand Injury as Non-Threshold Injury

The Personal Injury Commission (PIC) has ruled in Tasseli v Insurance Australia Limited t/as NRMA Insurance [2025] NSWPICMP 49 that damage to pre-existing surgical hardware constitutes a non-threshold injury, entitling the Claimant to ongoing statutory benefits and...

What are 5 legal requirements for a business?

When a new business is set up, there are various legal aspects which should be considered.  Some are more important than others in the early stages.  Obviously the nature of the business will dictate more specific legal requirements. We set out below some...

Court Dismisses Group Proceeding

A significant class action against Waller Legal Pty Ltd has been halted after the Supreme Court of Victoria ruled that the proceeding should no longer continue as a group proceeding. The case, Jane Jones (a pseudonym) v Waller Legal Pty Ltd [2025] VSC 42, involved...