Court overrules inheritance of Grandson

Nov 22, 2022 | Publication | 0 comments

A man who won an inheritance from a Supreme Court of NSW judge has had the same inheritance taken away from him by the NSW Court of Appeal.

Robert Wilcox was left out of his Grandfather’s Will and everything was left to Robert’s mother, Patricia. Robert brought a claim under the Succession Act 2006 (NSW) for provision from his Grandfather’s estate. The primary judge agreed with Robert’s claim and ordered that an immediate payment of $107,000 be made to Robert, with seven annual payments of $40,000 commencing after two years.

Patricia appealed to the NSW Court of Appeal and won. Justices Basten, Barrett and Gleeson ordered that the provision made by the primary judge be disallowed. Robert was ordered to pay Patricia’s costs.

The main issue in the case was whether the primary judge erred in his discretion to order provision in light of the factual circumstances.

The Court of Appeal held that it is appropriate to have regard to perceived prevailing community standards of what is right and appropriate even though this may be an imprecise, variable and contestable standard.

When determining whether community standards indicate that provision ought to be made for a grandchild, guidance may be taken from the reality that, generally, a grandparent does not have a responsibility to make provision for a grandchild. That responsibility is not enlivened because a grandparent contributes to a grandchild’s education or bestows considerable largesse on him or her. Something more than the existence of normal family relations and affections is required.

The conferral of particular care and affection by a grandchild and his or her legitimate expectations of inheritance may be relevant to determining whether such an obligation exists.

Other matters to be taken into account may include the size and nature of the estate, the relationships involved and the circumstances and needs of other persons.

The Court of Appeal in Chapple v Wilcox NSWCA 392 held that the decision of the primary judge, on the facts, was unreasonable or plainly unjust in such a way that there had been a failure to properly exercise the judicial discretion.

The information in this publication is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavour to provide accurate and timely information, we do not guarantee that the information in this publication is accurate at the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. We are not responsible for the information of any source to which a link is provided or reference is made and exclude all liability in connection with use of these sources. If you do not wish to receive newsletters from us, please let us know.

Latest Insights

How Vicissitudes Impact Future Economic Loss in Legal Cases

When it comes to calculating future economic loss in legal cases, one concept that often arises is "vicissitudes." But what exactly are vicissitudes, and how do they affect the compensation awarded to plaintiffs? In this article, we'll delve into the definition of...

Can you still make a claim?

Many claims have limitation periods. A limitation period is a set time frame within which an aggrieved person must commence proceedings in a Court. These limitation periods generally commence from the date of the injury and/or incident. Some claims however, such as...

Teacher convicted for failing to report sexual abuse of a child

Teacher, Mr Webb of Trinity College Perth, was unsuccessful in his appeal against his conviction of failing to report sexual abuse of a child in a decision delivered on 13 October 2021. In April 2017, a group of boys from the school went on a school rugby trip to...

Annual Dinner – Parramatta & District Regional Law Society

Western Sydney's legal profession gathered for the Annual Dinner of the Parramatta & District Regional Law Society at CommBank Stadium! We are particularly grateful to Dr Hugh McDermott MP, Parliamentary Secretary to the Attorney General, Senior Vice...

What compensation can I get if I have been injured at work?

If you have a work-related injury or illness, you may be able to claim compensation for lost income, medical expenses, travel expenses, domestic assistance, pain and suffering and permanent impairment. All employers are required to have workers compensation insurance...

Court makes provision for son left out of father’s Will

The recent Supreme Court of New South Wales decision of Rathswohl v Court  NSWSC 356, involved 3 siblings disputing their entitlements to their late father’s estate. The defendant, Yvette, claimed she cared for her father for the last 18 months before he...

If I die without a Will what can happen?

If you die without a Will there can be many unintended consequences. Some of these consequences may be: A person who you do not intend could control your estate.  This could even be someone you do not know.  An executor is a person who controls an estate...

10 Myths of Deceased Estates

Myth #1 – If I die without a Will it is no big deal. Truth:  It can be a very big deal.  There are lots of reasons for having a Will including controlling who is appointed as Executor, controlling who your Estate is paid to, appointing a Guardian for...