Two Ways a Contract can be ‘Illegal’

Nov 30, 2022 | Publication | 0 comments

A contract can be ‘illegal’ because it is prohibited by legislation or it infringes a rule of public policy.

Prohibited by Legislation

In order for a contract to be ‘illegal’ because it is prohibited by legislation, the contract must be expressly or impliedly prohibited by legislation.  An example might be a contract for gambling where parliament has prohibited and/or regulated such contracts.

It is important to remember that a failure to comply with a legislative requirement impacting upon a certain type of contract does not necessarily mean that the contract is automatically illegal.  It may be that the contract is rendered void, voidable or unenforceable.  For example, contracts for sale of land must be in writing but a failure to comply with this requirement does not mean the contract is ‘illegal’.

Infringes Public Policy

A contract may also be illegal because it infringes a rule of public policy.  An example may be where a contract involves the commission of a criminal offence.

Another example may be a contract that prejudices the administration of justice.

Impact of a contract being ‘illegal’

Generally speaking, if a contract is void and/or illegal, any action on the contract will not be possible.

Illegality can impact on the rights and remedies of the parties to the contract.  A court may refuse to grant relief to an illegal contract on the ground of, for instance, public policy.

If some but not all of the terms or conditions of a contract are illegal, the court may ‘sever’ the illegal terms or conditions but not deem the ‘non-illegal’ terms or conditions to be illegal.

A term or condition which is partially legal and partially illegal may be severable so as to allow the enforcement of the legal part of the term or condition.

Conclusion

It is important to obtain legal advice in relation to all of these matters.  Please feel free to contact us for an obligation free discussion.

The information in this publication is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavour to provide accurate and timely information, we do not guarantee that the information in this publication is accurate at the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. We are not responsible for the information of any source to which a link is provided or reference is made and exclude all liability in connection with use of these sources. If you do not wish to receive newsletters from us, please let us know.

Latest Insights

How does the court assess pain and suffering?

In New South Wales (NSW), the assessment of pain and suffering—referred to legally as non-economic loss—is governed by the Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) ("CLA"). This is compensation for the intangible effects of the injury, such as pain and suffering, loss of...

Property Disputes – How Can They Arise?

Property disputes arise in many different ways – not only in commercial contexts but also in residential settings.  Some of the types of property disputes include:...

Can a Child under 14 years commit a Crime?

In New South Wales, the age of criminal responsibility is 10 years old.  A child under 10 cannot be charged with a criminal offence. For children aged 10 to under 14, there is a legal presumption known as doli incapax, which assumes the child is incapable of...

Why is it important to know who your client is?

In a range of contexts, it is important to know who your client is. In most professional service contexts, the identity of the client is the starting point to providing advice.  If it is not clear who the professional advisor is advising, this can cause issues as...

Mental Harm Damages Following Birth Trauma: Lessons from Sorbello

In South Western Sydney Local Health District v Sorbello [2024] NSWCA 14, the New South Wales Court of Appeal has provided timely guidance on two important issues in personal injury litigation: how courts choose between competing expert opinions on mental harm, and...

Damages for Defamation – Newman v Whittington [2025] NSWSC 275

A family dispute resolution practitioner was awarded $150,000 in aggravated damages, $10,000 in interest, and an injunction in a recent Supreme Court of New South Wales case. The defendant posted defamatory statements about the plaintiff on WordPress, Facebook, and...

Review Panel Determines Right Hand Injury as Non-Threshold Injury

The Personal Injury Commission (PIC) has ruled in Tasseli v Insurance Australia Limited t/as NRMA Insurance [2025] NSWPICMP 49 that damage to pre-existing surgical hardware constitutes a non-threshold injury, entitling the Claimant to ongoing statutory benefits and...

What are 5 legal requirements for a business?

When a new business is set up, there are various legal aspects which should be considered.  Some are more important than others in the early stages.  Obviously the nature of the business will dictate more specific legal requirements. We set out below some...

Court Dismisses Group Proceeding

A significant class action against Waller Legal Pty Ltd has been halted after the Supreme Court of Victoria ruled that the proceeding should no longer continue as a group proceeding. The case, Jane Jones (a pseudonym) v Waller Legal Pty Ltd [2025] VSC 42, involved...